blob: 0fe973b49a3550235520ab0f87a55139f46fd18f [file] [log] [blame]
use clippy_utils::diagnostics::span_lint_and_help;
use clippy_utils::ty::implements_trait;
use clippy_utils::{if_sequence, in_constant, is_else_clause, SpanlessEq};
use rustc_hir::{BinOpKind, Expr, ExprKind};
use rustc_lint::{LateContext, LateLintPass};
use rustc_session::{declare_lint_pass, declare_tool_lint};
use rustc_span::sym;
declare_clippy_lint! {
/// ### What it does
/// Checks comparison chains written with `if` that can be
/// rewritten with `match` and `cmp`.
///
/// ### Why is this bad?
/// `if` is not guaranteed to be exhaustive and conditionals can get
/// repetitive
///
/// ### Known problems
/// The match statement may be slower due to the compiler
/// not inlining the call to cmp. See issue [#5354](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/issues/5354)
///
/// ### Example
/// ```rust,ignore
/// # fn a() {}
/// # fn b() {}
/// # fn c() {}
/// fn f(x: u8, y: u8) {
/// if x > y {
/// a()
/// } else if x < y {
/// b()
/// } else {
/// c()
/// }
/// }
/// ```
///
/// Use instead:
/// ```rust,ignore
/// use std::cmp::Ordering;
/// # fn a() {}
/// # fn b() {}
/// # fn c() {}
/// fn f(x: u8, y: u8) {
/// match x.cmp(&y) {
/// Ordering::Greater => a(),
/// Ordering::Less => b(),
/// Ordering::Equal => c()
/// }
/// }
/// ```
#[clippy::version = "1.40.0"]
pub COMPARISON_CHAIN,
style,
"`if`s that can be rewritten with `match` and `cmp`"
}
declare_lint_pass!(ComparisonChain => [COMPARISON_CHAIN]);
impl<'tcx> LateLintPass<'tcx> for ComparisonChain {
fn check_expr(&mut self, cx: &LateContext<'tcx>, expr: &'tcx Expr<'_>) {
if expr.span.from_expansion() {
return;
}
// We only care about the top-most `if` in the chain
if is_else_clause(cx.tcx, expr) {
return;
}
if in_constant(cx, expr.hir_id) {
return;
}
// Check that there exists at least one explicit else condition
let (conds, _) = if_sequence(expr);
if conds.len() < 2 {
return;
}
for cond in conds.windows(2) {
if let (&ExprKind::Binary(ref kind1, lhs1, rhs1), &ExprKind::Binary(ref kind2, lhs2, rhs2)) =
(&cond[0].kind, &cond[1].kind)
{
if !kind_is_cmp(kind1.node) || !kind_is_cmp(kind2.node) {
return;
}
// Check that both sets of operands are equal
let mut spanless_eq = SpanlessEq::new(cx);
let same_fixed_operands = spanless_eq.eq_expr(lhs1, lhs2) && spanless_eq.eq_expr(rhs1, rhs2);
let same_transposed_operands = spanless_eq.eq_expr(lhs1, rhs2) && spanless_eq.eq_expr(rhs1, lhs2);
if !same_fixed_operands && !same_transposed_operands {
return;
}
// Check that if the operation is the same, either it's not `==` or the operands are transposed
if kind1.node == kind2.node {
if kind1.node == BinOpKind::Eq {
return;
}
if !same_transposed_operands {
return;
}
}
// Check that the type being compared implements `core::cmp::Ord`
let ty = cx.typeck_results().expr_ty(lhs1);
let is_ord = cx
.tcx
.get_diagnostic_item(sym::Ord)
.map_or(false, |id| implements_trait(cx, ty, id, &[]));
if !is_ord {
return;
}
} else {
// We only care about comparison chains
return;
}
}
span_lint_and_help(
cx,
COMPARISON_CHAIN,
expr.span,
"`if` chain can be rewritten with `match`",
None,
"consider rewriting the `if` chain to use `cmp` and `match`",
);
}
}
fn kind_is_cmp(kind: BinOpKind) -> bool {
matches!(kind, BinOpKind::Lt | BinOpKind::Gt | BinOpKind::Eq)
}