blob: 48b2781463772bdf0d1416bc5d56c70bd41a51a3 [file] [log] [blame]
/*
* Copyright (C) 2016 The Android Open Source Project
*
* Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
* you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
* You may obtain a copy of the License at
*
* http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
*
* Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
* distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
* WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
* See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
* limitations under the License
*/
package libcore.java.util.concurrent;
import junit.framework.TestCase;
import java.util.concurrent.ArrayBlockingQueue;
import java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor;
import java.util.concurrent.TimeUnit;
public class ThreadPoolExecutorTest extends TestCase {
// http://b/27702221
public void testCorePoolSizeGreaterThanMax() {
ThreadPoolExecutor tp = new ThreadPoolExecutor(
1 /* core pool size */, 1 /* max pool size */,
1000, TimeUnit.MILLISECONDS, new ArrayBlockingQueue<>(10));
// It should be illegal to set a core pool size that's larger than the max
// pool size but apps have been allowed to get away with it so far. The pattern
// below occurs in a commonly used library. Note that the executor is in a
// consistent state at the end of both method calls.
tp.setCorePoolSize(5);
tp.setMaximumPoolSize(5);
}
}