Allow @RequiresPermission to be specified on parameters
This allows you to express that the permission requirement
on a method depends on a given parameter; static analysis
tools should then trace the supplied value backwards to
see whether it points to a constant which in turn has been
annotated with @RequiresPermission.
Change-Id: Ifaf3c2517a2c416b00409d646d6ec881c6b7af18
diff --git a/java/android/annotation/RequiresPermission.java b/java/android/annotation/RequiresPermission.java
index 4aed5c1..113c055 100644
--- a/java/android/annotation/RequiresPermission.java
+++ b/java/android/annotation/RequiresPermission.java
@@ -15,6 +15,8 @@
*/
package android.annotation;
+import android.content.Intent;
+
import java.lang.annotation.Retention;
import java.lang.annotation.Target;
@@ -22,6 +24,7 @@
import static java.lang.annotation.ElementType.CONSTRUCTOR;
import static java.lang.annotation.ElementType.FIELD;
import static java.lang.annotation.ElementType.METHOD;
+import static java.lang.annotation.ElementType.PARAMETER;
import static java.lang.annotation.RetentionPolicy.SOURCE;
/**
@@ -51,11 +54,31 @@
* @RequiresPermission.Write(@RequiresPermission(WRITE_HISTORY_BOOKMARKS))
* public static final Uri BOOKMARKS_URI = Uri.parse("content://browser/bookmarks");
* }</pre>
+ * <p>
+ * When specified on a parameter, the annotation indicates that the method requires
+ * a permission which depends on the value of the parameter. For example, consider
+ * {@link android.app.Activity#startActivity(Intent)}:
+ * <pre>{@code
+ * public void startActivity(@RequiresPermission Intent intent) { ... }
+ * }</pre>
+ * Notice how there are no actual permission names listed in the annotation. The actual
+ * permissions required will depend on the particular intent passed in. For example,
+ * the code may look like this:
+ * <pre>{@code
+ * Intent intent = new Intent(Intent.ACTION_CALL);
+ * startActivity(intent);
+ * }</pre>
+ * and the actual permission requirement for this particular intent is described on
+ * the Intent name itself:
+ * <pre>{@code
+ * @RequiresPermission(Manifest.permission.CALL_PHONE)
+ * public static final String ACTION_CALL = "android.intent.action.CALL";
+ * }</pre>
*
* @hide
*/
@Retention(SOURCE)
-@Target({ANNOTATION_TYPE,METHOD,CONSTRUCTOR,FIELD})
+@Target({ANNOTATION_TYPE,METHOD,CONSTRUCTOR,FIELD,PARAMETER})
public @interface RequiresPermission {
/**
* The name of the permission that is required, if precisely one permission
@@ -87,18 +110,28 @@
boolean conditional() default false;
/**
- * Specifies that the given permission is required for read operations
+ * Specifies that the given permission is required for read operations.
+ * <p>
+ * When specified on a parameter, the annotation indicates that the method requires
+ * a permission which depends on the value of the parameter (and typically
+ * the corresponding field passed in will be one of a set of constants which have
+ * been annotated with a {@code @RequiresPermission} annotation.)
*/
- @Target(FIELD)
+ @Target({FIELD, METHOD, PARAMETER})
@interface Read {
- RequiresPermission value();
+ RequiresPermission value() default @RequiresPermission;
}
/**
- * Specifies that the given permission is required for write operations
+ * Specifies that the given permission is required for write operations.
+ * <p>
+ * When specified on a parameter, the annotation indicates that the method requires
+ * a permission which depends on the value of the parameter (and typically
+ * the corresponding field passed in will be one of a set of constants which have
+ * been annotated with a {@code @RequiresPermission} annotation.)
*/
- @Target(FIELD)
+ @Target({FIELD, METHOD, PARAMETER})
@interface Write {
- RequiresPermission value();
+ RequiresPermission value() default @RequiresPermission;
}
}