Test passing an underlying network array with null network in it.

Current code treats these nulls as if they weren't there.

Bug: 172870110
Test: test-only change
Change-Id: Id4632e1b004c09910b4b7613f7233d2c19e2f0ac
Merged-In: Id4632e1b004c09910b4b7613f7233d2c19e2f0ac
(cherry picked from commit eccd26239024ca2a401e354fb16b855fa72f9923)
diff --git a/tests/net/java/com/android/server/ConnectivityServiceTest.java b/tests/net/java/com/android/server/ConnectivityServiceTest.java
index bb39af9..9945853 100644
--- a/tests/net/java/com/android/server/ConnectivityServiceTest.java
+++ b/tests/net/java/com/android/server/ConnectivityServiceTest.java
@@ -4896,8 +4896,6 @@
 
         final Network[] cellAndVpn = new Network[] {
                 mCellNetworkAgent.getNetwork(), mMockVpn.getNetwork()};
-        Network[] cellAndWifi = new Network[] {
-                mCellNetworkAgent.getNetwork(), mWiFiNetworkAgent.getNetwork()};
 
         // A VPN with default (null) underlying networks sets the underlying network's interfaces...
         expectForceUpdateIfaces(cellAndVpn, MOBILE_IFNAME, Process.myUid(), VPN_IFNAME,
@@ -4907,10 +4905,13 @@
         mWiFiNetworkAgent = new TestNetworkAgentWrapper(TRANSPORT_WIFI);
         mWiFiNetworkAgent.connect(false);
         mWiFiNetworkAgent.sendLinkProperties(wifiLp);
+        final Network[] onlyNull = new Network[]{null};
         final Network[] wifiAndVpn = new Network[] {
                 mWiFiNetworkAgent.getNetwork(), mMockVpn.getNetwork()};
-        cellAndWifi = new Network[] {
+        final Network[] cellAndWifi = new Network[] {
                 mCellNetworkAgent.getNetwork(), mWiFiNetworkAgent.getNetwork()};
+        final Network[] cellNullAndWifi = new Network[] {
+                mCellNetworkAgent.getNetwork(), null, mWiFiNetworkAgent.getNetwork()};
 
         waitForIdle();
         assertEquals(wifiLp, mService.getActiveLinkProperties());
@@ -4936,6 +4937,13 @@
                 new String[]{MOBILE_IFNAME, WIFI_IFNAME});
         reset(mStatsService);
 
+        // Null underlying networks are ignored.
+        mService.setUnderlyingNetworksForVpn(cellNullAndWifi);
+        waitForIdle();
+        expectForceUpdateIfaces(wifiAndVpn, MOBILE_IFNAME, Process.myUid(), VPN_IFNAME,
+                new String[]{MOBILE_IFNAME, WIFI_IFNAME});
+        reset(mStatsService);
+
         // If an underlying network disconnects, that interface should no longer be underlying.
         // This doesn't actually work because disconnectAndDestroyNetwork only notifies
         // NetworkStatsService before the underlying network is actually removed. So the underlying
@@ -4970,6 +4978,7 @@
                 argThat(vpnInfos -> vpnInfos[0].underlyingIfaces.length == 1
                         && WIFI_IFNAME.equals(vpnInfos[0].underlyingIfaces[0])));
         mEthernetNetworkAgent.disconnect();
+        waitForIdle();
         reset(mStatsService);
 
         // When a VPN declares no underlying networks (i.e., no connectivity), getAllVpnInfo
@@ -4982,6 +4991,18 @@
         waitForIdle();
         expectForceUpdateIfaces(wifiAndVpn, null);
         reset(mStatsService);
+
+        // Specifying only a null underlying network is the same as no networks.
+        mService.setUnderlyingNetworksForVpn(onlyNull);
+        waitForIdle();
+        expectForceUpdateIfaces(wifiAndVpn, null);
+        reset(mStatsService);
+
+        // Specifying networks that are all disconnected is the same as specifying no networks.
+        mService.setUnderlyingNetworksForVpn(onlyCell);
+        waitForIdle();
+        expectForceUpdateIfaces(wifiAndVpn, null);
+        reset(mStatsService);
     }
 
     @Test