Explain why there are two licenses in here.
Test: treehugger
Change-Id: Ib3eaa756cc5e36cc58371e45241b2537798f90d7
diff --git a/Android.bp b/Android.bp
index 9db5ece..8a1c818 100644
--- a/Android.bp
+++ b/Android.bp
@@ -2,30 +2,13 @@
default_applicable_licenses: ["external_zopfli_license"],
}
-// Added automatically by a large-scale-change that took the approach of
-// 'apply every license found to every target'. While this makes sure we respect
-// every license restriction, it may not be entirely correct.
-//
-// e.g. GPL in an MIT project might only apply to the contrib/ directory.
-//
-// Please consider splitting the single license below into multiple licenses,
-// taking care not to lose any license_kind information, and overriding the
-// default license using the 'licenses: [...]' property on targets as needed.
-//
-// For unused files, consider creating a 'filegroup' with "//visibility:private"
-// to attach the license to, and including a comment whether the files may be
-// used in the current project.
-//
-// large-scale-change included anything that looked like it might be a license
-// text as a license_text. e.g. LICENSE, NOTICE, COPYING etc.
-//
-// Please consider removing redundant or irrelevant files from 'license_text:'.
-// http://go/android-license-faq
license {
name: "external_zopfli_license",
visibility: [":__subpackages__"],
license_kinds: [
+ // Most of the code is APL2...
"SPDX-license-identifier-Apache-2.0",
+ // ...but src/zopflipng/lodepng is zlib instead.
"SPDX-license-identifier-Zlib",
],
license_text: [
