Remove a comment that is no longer valid. The real reason we (now)
don't provide strtoll etc is that we don't need the flexibility and
are too lazy to implement the general case :) But that does not
warrant a comment in the code.
git-svn-id: svn://svn.valgrind.org/valgrind/trunk@14540 a5019735-40e9-0310-863c-91ae7b9d1cf9
diff --git a/include/pub_tool_libcbase.h b/include/pub_tool_libcbase.h
index 2c35ef2..819935f 100644
--- a/include/pub_tool_libcbase.h
+++ b/include/pub_tool_libcbase.h
@@ -54,11 +54,6 @@
// is set to the start of the string. None of them test that the number
// fits into 64 bits.
//
-// Nb: if you're wondering why we don't just have a single VG_(strtoll) which
-// takes a base, it's because I wanted it to assert if it was given a bogus
-// base (the standard glibc one sets 'errno' in this case). But
-// m_libcbase.c doesn't import any code, not even vg_assert. --njn
-//
// Nb: we also don't provide VG_(atoll*); these functions are worse than
// useless because they don't do any error checking and so accept malformed
// numbers and non-numbers -- eg. "123xyz" gives 123, and "foo" gives 0!
