blob: 09afcba63c7e0bfcf9822e804a1befd5c9fd75b6 [file] [log] [blame]
// Copyright 2009 Daniel James.
// Distributed under the Boost Software License, Version 1.0. (See accompanying
// file LICENSE_1_0.txt or copy at http://www.boost.org/LICENSE_1_0.txt)
// clang-format off
#include "../helpers/prefix.hpp"
#include <boost/unordered_map.hpp>
#include <boost/unordered_set.hpp>
#include "../helpers/postfix.hpp"
// clang-format on
#include <utility>
namespace x {
struct D
{
boost::unordered_map<D, D> x;
};
}
namespace incomplete_test {
// Declare, but don't define some types.
struct value;
struct hash;
struct equals;
template <class T> struct allocator;
// Declare some instances
typedef boost::unordered_map<value, value, hash, equals,
allocator<std::pair<value const, value> > >
map;
typedef boost::unordered_multimap<value, value, hash, equals,
allocator<std::pair<value const, value> > >
multimap;
typedef boost::unordered_set<value, hash, equals, allocator<value> > set;
typedef boost::unordered_multiset<value, hash, equals, allocator<value> >
multiset;
// Now define the types which are stored as members, as they are needed for
// declaring struct members.
struct hash
{
template <typename T> std::size_t operator()(T const&) const { return 0; }
};
struct equals
{
template <typename T> bool operator()(T const&, T const&) const
{
return true;
}
};
// This is a dubious way to implement an allocator, but good enough
// for this test.
template <typename T> struct allocator : std::allocator<T>
{
allocator() {}
template <typename T2>
allocator(const allocator<T2>& other) : std::allocator<T>(other)
{
}
template <typename T2>
allocator(const std::allocator<T2>& other) : std::allocator<T>(other)
{
}
};
// Declare some members of a structs.
//
// Incomplete hash, equals and allocator aren't here supported at the
// moment.
struct struct1
{
boost::unordered_map<struct1, struct1, hash, equals,
allocator<std::pair<struct1 const, struct1> > >
x;
};
struct struct2
{
boost::unordered_multimap<struct2, struct2, hash, equals,
allocator<std::pair<struct2 const, struct2> > >
x;
};
struct struct3
{
boost::unordered_set<struct3, hash, equals, allocator<struct3> > x;
};
struct struct4
{
boost::unordered_multiset<struct4, hash, equals, allocator<struct4> > x;
};
// Now define the value type.
struct value
{
};
// Create some instances.
incomplete_test::map m1;
incomplete_test::multimap m2;
incomplete_test::set s1;
incomplete_test::multiset s2;
incomplete_test::struct1 c1;
incomplete_test::struct2 c2;
incomplete_test::struct3 c3;
incomplete_test::struct4 c4;
// Now declare, but don't define, the operators required for comparing
// elements.
std::size_t hash_value(value const&);
bool operator==(value const&, value const&);
std::size_t hash_value(struct1 const&);
std::size_t hash_value(struct2 const&);
std::size_t hash_value(struct3 const&);
std::size_t hash_value(struct4 const&);
bool operator==(struct1 const&, struct1 const&);
bool operator==(struct2 const&, struct2 const&);
bool operator==(struct3 const&, struct3 const&);
bool operator==(struct4 const&, struct4 const&);
// And finally use these
void use_types()
{
incomplete_test::value x;
m1[x] = x;
m2.insert(std::make_pair(x, x));
s1.insert(x);
s2.insert(x);
c1.x.insert(std::make_pair(c1, c1));
c2.x.insert(std::make_pair(c2, c2));
c3.x.insert(c3);
c4.x.insert(c4);
}
// And finally define the operators required for comparing elements.
std::size_t hash_value(value const&) { return 0; }
bool operator==(value const&, value const&) { return true; }
std::size_t hash_value(struct1 const&) { return 0; }
std::size_t hash_value(struct2 const&) { return 0; }
std::size_t hash_value(struct3 const&) { return 0; }
std::size_t hash_value(struct4 const&) { return 0; }
bool operator==(struct1 const&, struct1 const&) { return true; }
bool operator==(struct2 const&, struct2 const&) { return true; }
bool operator==(struct3 const&, struct3 const&) { return true; }
bool operator==(struct4 const&, struct4 const&) { return true; }
}
int main()
{
// This could just be a compile test, but I like to be able to run these
// things. It's probably irrational, but I find it reassuring.
incomplete_test::use_types();
}