|
******************************* |
|
HOWTO Use Python in the web |
|
******************************* |
|
|
|
:Author: Marek Kubica |
|
|
|
.. topic:: Abstract |
|
|
|
This document shows how Python fits into the web. It presents some ways |
|
to integrate Python with a web server, and general practices useful for |
|
developing web sites. |
|
|
|
|
|
Programming for the Web has become a hot topic since the rise of "Web 2.0", |
|
which focuses on user-generated content on web sites. It has always been |
|
possible to use Python for creating web sites, but it was a rather tedious task. |
|
Therefore, many frameworks and helper tools have been created to assist |
|
developers in creating faster and more robust sites. This HOWTO describes |
|
some of the methods used to combine Python with a web server to create |
|
dynamic content. It is not meant as a complete introduction, as this topic is |
|
far too broad to be covered in one single document. However, a short overview |
|
of the most popular libraries is provided. |
|
|
|
.. seealso:: |
|
|
|
While this HOWTO tries to give an overview of Python in the web, it cannot |
|
always be as up to date as desired. Web development in Python is rapidly |
|
moving forward, so the wiki page on `Web Programming |
|
<https://wiki.python.org/moin/WebProgramming>`_ may be more in sync with |
|
recent development. |
|
|
|
|
|
The Low-Level View |
|
================== |
|
|
|
When a user enters a web site, their browser makes a connection to the site's |
|
web server (this is called the *request*). The server looks up the file in the |
|
file system and sends it back to the user's browser, which displays it (this is |
|
the *response*). This is roughly how the underlying protocol, HTTP, works. |
|
|
|
Dynamic web sites are not based on files in the file system, but rather on |
|
programs which are run by the web server when a request comes in, and which |
|
*generate* the content that is returned to the user. They can do all sorts of |
|
useful things, like display the postings of a bulletin board, show your email, |
|
configure software, or just display the current time. These programs can be |
|
written in any programming language the server supports. Since most servers |
|
support Python, it is easy to use Python to create dynamic web sites. |
|
|
|
Most HTTP servers are written in C or C++, so they cannot execute Python code |
|
directly -- a bridge is needed between the server and the program. These |
|
bridges, or rather interfaces, define how programs interact with the server. |
|
There have been numerous attempts to create the best possible interface, but |
|
there are only a few worth mentioning. |
|
|
|
Not every web server supports every interface. Many web servers only support |
|
old, now-obsolete interfaces; however, they can often be extended using |
|
third-party modules to support newer ones. |
|
|
|
|
|
Common Gateway Interface |
|
------------------------ |
|
|
|
This interface, most commonly referred to as "CGI", is the oldest, and is |
|
supported by nearly every web server out of the box. Programs using CGI to |
|
communicate with their web server need to be started by the server for every |
|
request. So, every request starts a new Python interpreter -- which takes some |
|
time to start up -- thus making the whole interface only usable for low load |
|
situations. |
|
|
|
The upside of CGI is that it is simple -- writing a Python program which uses |
|
CGI is a matter of about three lines of code. This simplicity comes at a |
|
price: it does very few things to help the developer. |
|
|
|
Writing CGI programs, while still possible, is no longer recommended. With |
|
:ref:`WSGI <WSGI>`, a topic covered later in this document, it is possible to write |
|
programs that emulate CGI, so they can be run as CGI if no better option is |
|
available. |
|
|
|
.. seealso:: |
|
|
|
The Python standard library includes some modules that are helpful for |
|
creating plain CGI programs: |
|
|
|
* :mod:`cgi` -- Handling of user input in CGI scripts |
|
* :mod:`cgitb` -- Displays nice tracebacks when errors happen in CGI |
|
applications, instead of presenting a "500 Internal Server Error" message |
|
|
|
The Python wiki features a page on `CGI scripts |
|
<https://wiki.python.org/moin/CgiScripts>`_ with some additional information |
|
about CGI in Python. |
|
|
|
|
|
Simple script for testing CGI |
|
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ |
|
|
|
To test whether your web server works with CGI, you can use this short and |
|
simple CGI program:: |
|
|
|
#!/usr/bin/env python |
|
# -*- coding: UTF-8 -*- |
|
|
|
# enable debugging |
|
import cgitb |
|
cgitb.enable() |
|
|
|
print "Content-Type: text/plain;charset=utf-8" |
|
print |
|
|
|
print "Hello World!" |
|
|
|
Depending on your web server configuration, you may need to save this code with |
|
a ``.py`` or ``.cgi`` extension. Additionally, this file may also need to be |
|
in a ``cgi-bin`` folder, for security reasons. |
|
|
|
You might wonder what the ``cgitb`` line is about. This line makes it possible |
|
to display a nice traceback instead of just crashing and displaying an "Internal |
|
Server Error" in the user's browser. This is useful for debugging, but it might |
|
risk exposing some confidential data to the user. You should not use ``cgitb`` |
|
in production code for this reason. You should *always* catch exceptions, and |
|
display proper error pages -- end-users don't like to see nondescript "Internal |
|
Server Errors" in their browsers. |
|
|
|
|
|
Setting up CGI on your own server |
|
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ |
|
|
|
If you don't have your own web server, this does not apply to you. You can |
|
check whether it works as-is, and if not you will need to talk to the |
|
administrator of your web server. If it is a big host, you can try filing a |
|
ticket asking for Python support. |
|
|
|
If you are your own administrator or want to set up CGI for testing purposes on |
|
your own computers, you have to configure it by yourself. There is no single |
|
way to configure CGI, as there are many web servers with different |
|
configuration options. Currently the most widely used free web server is |
|
`Apache HTTPd <http://httpd.apache.org/>`_, or Apache for short. Apache can be |
|
easily installed on nearly every system using the system's package management |
|
tool. `lighttpd <http://www.lighttpd.net>`_ is another alternative and is |
|
said to have better performance. On many systems this server can also be |
|
installed using the package management tool, so manually compiling the web |
|
server may not be needed. |
|
|
|
* On Apache you can take a look at the `Dynamic Content with CGI |
|
<http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/howto/cgi.html>`_ tutorial, where everything |
|
is described. Most of the time it is enough just to set ``+ExecCGI``. The |
|
tutorial also describes the most common gotchas that might arise. |
|
|
|
* On lighttpd you need to use the `CGI module |
|
<http://redmine.lighttpd.net/projects/lighttpd/wiki/Docs_ModCGI>`_\ , which can be configured |
|
in a straightforward way. It boils down to setting ``cgi.assign`` properly. |
|
|
|
|
|
Common problems with CGI scripts |
|
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ |
|
|
|
Using CGI sometimes leads to small annoyances while trying to get these |
|
scripts to run. Sometimes a seemingly correct script does not work as |
|
expected, the cause being some small hidden problem that's difficult to spot. |
|
|
|
Some of these potential problems are: |
|
|
|
* The Python script is not marked as executable. When CGI scripts are not |
|
executable most web servers will let the user download it, instead of |
|
running it and sending the output to the user. For CGI scripts to run |
|
properly on Unix-like operating systems, the ``+x`` bit needs to be set. |
|
Using ``chmod a+x your_script.py`` may solve this problem. |
|
|
|
* On a Unix-like system, The line endings in the program file must be Unix |
|
style line endings. This is important because the web server checks the |
|
first line of the script (called shebang) and tries to run the program |
|
specified there. It gets easily confused by Windows line endings (Carriage |
|
Return & Line Feed, also called CRLF), so you have to convert the file to |
|
Unix line endings (only Line Feed, LF). This can be done automatically by |
|
uploading the file via FTP in text mode instead of binary mode, but the |
|
preferred way is just telling your editor to save the files with Unix line |
|
endings. Most editors support this. |
|
|
|
* Your web server must be able to read the file, and you need to make sure the |
|
permissions are correct. On unix-like systems, the server often runs as user |
|
and group ``www-data``, so it might be worth a try to change the file |
|
ownership, or making the file world readable by using ``chmod a+r |
|
your_script.py``. |
|
|
|
* The web server must know that the file you're trying to access is a CGI script. |
|
Check the configuration of your web server, as it may be configured |
|
to expect a specific file extension for CGI scripts. |
|
|
|
* On Unix-like systems, the path to the interpreter in the shebang |
|
(``#!/usr/bin/env python``) must be correct. This line calls |
|
``/usr/bin/env`` to find Python, but it will fail if there is no |
|
``/usr/bin/env``, or if Python is not in the web server's path. If you know |
|
where your Python is installed, you can also use that full path. The |
|
commands ``whereis python`` and ``type -p python`` could help you find |
|
where it is installed. Once you know the path, you can change the shebang |
|
accordingly: ``#!/usr/bin/python``. |
|
|
|
* The file must not contain a BOM (Byte Order Mark). The BOM is meant for |
|
determining the byte order of UTF-16 and UTF-32 encodings, but some editors |
|
write this also into UTF-8 files. The BOM interferes with the shebang line, |
|
so be sure to tell your editor not to write the BOM. |
|
|
|
* If the web server is using :ref:`mod-python`, ``mod_python`` may be having |
|
problems. ``mod_python`` is able to handle CGI scripts by itself, but it can |
|
also be a source of issues. |
|
|
|
|
|
.. _mod-python: |
|
|
|
mod_python |
|
---------- |
|
|
|
People coming from PHP often find it hard to grasp how to use Python in the web. |
|
Their first thought is mostly `mod_python <http://modpython.org/>`_\ , |
|
because they think that this is the equivalent to ``mod_php``. Actually, there |
|
are many differences. What ``mod_python`` does is embed the interpreter into |
|
the Apache process, thus speeding up requests by not having to start a Python |
|
interpreter for each request. On the other hand, it is not "Python intermixed |
|
with HTML" in the way that PHP is often intermixed with HTML. The Python |
|
equivalent of that is a template engine. ``mod_python`` itself is much more |
|
powerful and provides more access to Apache internals. It can emulate CGI, |
|
work in a "Python Server Pages" mode (similar to JSP) which is "HTML |
|
intermingled with Python", and it has a "Publisher" which designates one file |
|
to accept all requests and decide what to do with them. |
|
|
|
``mod_python`` does have some problems. Unlike the PHP interpreter, the Python |
|
interpreter uses caching when executing files, so changes to a file will |
|
require the web server to be restarted. Another problem is the basic concept |
|
-- Apache starts child processes to handle the requests, and unfortunately |
|
every child process needs to load the whole Python interpreter even if it does |
|
not use it. This makes the whole web server slower. Another problem is that, |
|
because ``mod_python`` is linked against a specific version of ``libpython``, |
|
it is not possible to switch from an older version to a newer (e.g. 2.4 to 2.5) |
|
without recompiling ``mod_python``. ``mod_python`` is also bound to the Apache |
|
web server, so programs written for ``mod_python`` cannot easily run on other |
|
web servers. |
|
|
|
These are the reasons why ``mod_python`` should be avoided when writing new |
|
programs. In some circumstances it still might be a good idea to use |
|
``mod_python`` for deployment, but WSGI makes it possible to run WSGI programs |
|
under ``mod_python`` as well. |
|
|
|
|
|
FastCGI and SCGI |
|
---------------- |
|
|
|
FastCGI and SCGI try to solve the performance problem of CGI in another way. |
|
Instead of embedding the interpreter into the web server, they create |
|
long-running background processes. There is still a module in the web server |
|
which makes it possible for the web server to "speak" with the background |
|
process. As the background process is independent of the server, it can be |
|
written in any language, including Python. The language just needs to have a |
|
library which handles the communication with the webserver. |
|
|
|
The difference between FastCGI and SCGI is very small, as SCGI is essentially |
|
just a "simpler FastCGI". As the web server support for SCGI is limited, |
|
most people use FastCGI instead, which works the same way. Almost everything |
|
that applies to SCGI also applies to FastCGI as well, so we'll only cover |
|
the latter. |
|
|
|
These days, FastCGI is never used directly. Just like ``mod_python``, it is only |
|
used for the deployment of WSGI applications. |
|
|
|
|
|
Setting up FastCGI |
|
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ |
|
|
|
Each web server requires a specific module. |
|
|
|
* Apache has both `mod_fastcgi <http://www.fastcgi.com/drupal/>`_ and `mod_fcgid |
|
<https://httpd.apache.org/mod_fcgid/>`_. ``mod_fastcgi`` is the original one, but it |
|
has some licensing issues, which is why it is sometimes considered non-free. |
|
``mod_fcgid`` is a smaller, compatible alternative. One of these modules needs |
|
to be loaded by Apache. |
|
|
|
* lighttpd ships its own `FastCGI module |
|
<http://redmine.lighttpd.net/projects/lighttpd/wiki/Docs_ModFastCGI>`_ as well as an |
|
`SCGI module <http://redmine.lighttpd.net/projects/lighttpd/wiki/Docs_ModSCGI>`_. |
|
|
|
* `nginx <http://nginx.org/>`_ also supports `FastCGI |
|
<https://www.nginx.com/resources/wiki/start/topics/examples/simplepythonfcgi/>`_. |
|
|
|
Once you have installed and configured the module, you can test it with the |
|
following WSGI-application:: |
|
|
|
#!/usr/bin/env python |
|
# -*- coding: UTF-8 -*- |
|
|
|
from cgi import escape |
|
import sys, os |
|
from flup.server.fcgi import WSGIServer |
|
|
|
def app(environ, start_response): |
|
start_response('200 OK', [('Content-Type', 'text/html')]) |
|
|
|
yield '<h1>FastCGI Environment</h1>' |
|
yield '<table>' |
|
for k, v in sorted(environ.items()): |
|
yield '<tr><th>%s</th><td>%s</td></tr>' % (escape(k), escape(v)) |
|
yield '</table>' |
|
|
|
WSGIServer(app).run() |
|
|
|
This is a simple WSGI application, but you need to install `flup |
|
<https://pypi.org/project/flup/1.0>`_ first, as flup handles the low level |
|
FastCGI access. |
|
|
|
.. seealso:: |
|
|
|
There is some documentation on `setting up Django with WSGI |
|
<https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/dev/howto/deployment/wsgi/>`_, most of |
|
which can be reused for other WSGI-compliant frameworks and libraries. |
|
Only the ``manage.py`` part has to be changed, the example used here can be |
|
used instead. Django does more or less the exact same thing. |
|
|
|
|
|
mod_wsgi |
|
-------- |
|
|
|
`mod_wsgi <http://code.google.com/p/modwsgi/>`_ is an attempt to get rid of the |
|
low level gateways. Given that FastCGI, SCGI, and mod_python are mostly used to |
|
deploy WSGI applications, mod_wsgi was started to directly embed WSGI applications |
|
into the Apache web server. mod_wsgi is specifically designed to host WSGI |
|
applications. It makes the deployment of WSGI applications much easier than |
|
deployment using other low level methods, which need glue code. The downside |
|
is that mod_wsgi is limited to the Apache web server; other servers would need |
|
their own implementations of mod_wsgi. |
|
|
|
mod_wsgi supports two modes: embedded mode, in which it integrates with the |
|
Apache process, and daemon mode, which is more FastCGI-like. Unlike FastCGI, |
|
mod_wsgi handles the worker-processes by itself, which makes administration |
|
easier. |
|
|
|
|
|
.. _WSGI: |
|
|
|
Step back: WSGI |
|
=============== |
|
|
|
WSGI has already been mentioned several times, so it has to be something |
|
important. In fact it really is, and now it is time to explain it. |
|
|
|
The *Web Server Gateway Interface*, or WSGI for short, is defined in |
|
:pep:`333` and is currently the best way to do Python web programming. While |
|
it is great for programmers writing frameworks, a normal web developer does not |
|
need to get in direct contact with it. When choosing a framework for web |
|
development it is a good idea to choose one which supports WSGI. |
|
|
|
The big benefit of WSGI is the unification of the application programming |
|
interface. When your program is compatible with WSGI -- which at the outer |
|
level means that the framework you are using has support for WSGI -- your |
|
program can be deployed via any web server interface for which there are WSGI |
|
wrappers. You do not need to care about whether the application user uses |
|
mod_python or FastCGI or mod_wsgi -- with WSGI your application will work on |
|
any gateway interface. The Python standard library contains its own WSGI |
|
server, :mod:`wsgiref`, which is a small web server that can be used for |
|
testing. |
|
|
|
A really great WSGI feature is middleware. Middleware is a layer around your |
|
program which can add various functionality to it. There is quite a bit of |
|
`middleware <https://wsgi.readthedocs.org/en/latest/libraries.html>`_ already |
|
available. For example, instead of writing your own session management (HTTP |
|
is a stateless protocol, so to associate multiple HTTP requests with a single |
|
user your application must create and manage such state via a session), you can |
|
just download middleware which does that, plug it in, and get on with coding |
|
the unique parts of your application. The same thing with compression -- there |
|
is existing middleware which handles compressing your HTML using gzip to save |
|
on your server's bandwidth. Authentication is another problem that is easily |
|
solved using existing middleware. |
|
|
|
Although WSGI may seem complex, the initial phase of learning can be very |
|
rewarding because WSGI and the associated middleware already have solutions to |
|
many problems that might arise while developing web sites. |
|
|
|
|
|
WSGI Servers |
|
------------ |
|
|
|
The code that is used to connect to various low level gateways like CGI or |
|
mod_python is called a *WSGI server*. One of these servers is ``flup``, which |
|
supports FastCGI and SCGI, as well as `AJP |
|
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apache_JServ_Protocol>`_. Some of these servers |
|
are written in Python, as ``flup`` is, but there also exist others which are |
|
written in C and can be used as drop-in replacements. |
|
|
|
There are many servers already available, so a Python web application |
|
can be deployed nearly anywhere. This is one big advantage that Python has |
|
compared with other web technologies. |
|
|
|
.. seealso:: |
|
|
|
A good overview of WSGI-related code can be found in the `WSGI homepage |
|
<https://wsgi.readthedocs.org/>`_, which contains an extensive list of `WSGI servers |
|
<https://wsgi.readthedocs.org/en/latest/servers.html>`_ which can be used by *any* application |
|
supporting WSGI. |
|
|
|
You might be interested in some WSGI-supporting modules already contained in |
|
the standard library, namely: |
|
|
|
* :mod:`wsgiref` -- some tiny utilities and servers for WSGI |
|
|
|
|
|
Case study: MoinMoin |
|
-------------------- |
|
|
|
What does WSGI give the web application developer? Let's take a look at |
|
an application that's been around for a while, which was written in |
|
Python without using WSGI. |
|
|
|
One of the most widely used wiki software packages is `MoinMoin |
|
<https://moinmo.in/>`_. It was created in 2000, so it predates WSGI by about |
|
three years. Older versions needed separate code to run on CGI, mod_python, |
|
FastCGI and standalone. |
|
|
|
It now includes support for WSGI. Using WSGI, it is possible to deploy |
|
MoinMoin on any WSGI compliant server, with no additional glue code. |
|
Unlike the pre-WSGI versions, this could include WSGI servers that the |
|
authors of MoinMoin know nothing about. |
|
|
|
|
|
Model-View-Controller |
|
===================== |
|
|
|
The term *MVC* is often encountered in statements such as "framework *foo* |
|
supports MVC". MVC is more about the overall organization of code, rather than |
|
any particular API. Many web frameworks use this model to help the developer |
|
bring structure to their program. Bigger web applications can have lots of |
|
code, so it is a good idea to have an effective structure right from the beginning. |
|
That way, even users of other frameworks (or even other languages, since MVC is |
|
not Python-specific) can easily understand the code, given that they are |
|
already familiar with the MVC structure. |
|
|
|
MVC stands for three components: |
|
|
|
* The *model*. This is the data that will be displayed and modified. In |
|
Python frameworks, this component is often represented by the classes used by |
|
an object-relational mapper. |
|
|
|
* The *view*. This component's job is to display the data of the model to the |
|
user. Typically this component is implemented via templates. |
|
|
|
* The *controller*. This is the layer between the user and the model. The |
|
controller reacts to user actions (like opening some specific URL), tells |
|
the model to modify the data if necessary, and tells the view code what to |
|
display, |
|
|
|
While one might think that MVC is a complex design pattern, in fact it is not. |
|
It is used in Python because it has turned out to be useful for creating clean, |
|
maintainable web sites. |
|
|
|
.. note:: |
|
|
|
While not all Python frameworks explicitly support MVC, it is often trivial |
|
to create a web site which uses the MVC pattern by separating the data logic |
|
(the model) from the user interaction logic (the controller) and the |
|
templates (the view). That's why it is important not to write unnecessary |
|
Python code in the templates -- it works against the MVC model and creates |
|
chaos in the code base, making it harder to understand and modify. |
|
|
|
.. seealso:: |
|
|
|
The English Wikipedia has an article about the `Model-View-Controller pattern |
|
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Model%E2%80%93view%E2%80%93controller>`_. It includes a long |
|
list of web frameworks for various programming languages. |
|
|
|
|
|
Ingredients for Websites |
|
======================== |
|
|
|
Websites are complex constructs, so tools have been created to help web |
|
developers make their code easier to write and more maintainable. Tools like |
|
these exist for all web frameworks in all languages. Developers are not forced |
|
to use these tools, and often there is no "best" tool. It is worth learning |
|
about the available tools because they can greatly simplify the process of |
|
developing a web site. |
|
|
|
|
|
.. seealso:: |
|
|
|
There are far more components than can be presented here. The Python wiki |
|
has a page about these components, called |
|
`Web Components <https://wiki.python.org/moin/WebComponents>`_. |
|
|
|
|
|
Templates |
|
--------- |
|
|
|
Mixing of HTML and Python code is made possible by a few libraries. While |
|
convenient at first, it leads to horribly unmaintainable code. That's why |
|
templates exist. Templates are, in the simplest case, just HTML files with |
|
placeholders. The HTML is sent to the user's browser after filling in the |
|
placeholders. |
|
|
|
Python already includes two ways to build simple templates:: |
|
|
|
>>> template = "<html><body><h1>Hello %s!</h1></body></html>" |
|
>>> print template % "Reader" |
|
<html><body><h1>Hello Reader!</h1></body></html> |
|
|
|
>>> from string import Template |
|
>>> template = Template("<html><body><h1>Hello ${name}</h1></body></html>") |
|
>>> print template.substitute(dict(name='Dinsdale')) |
|
<html><body><h1>Hello Dinsdale!</h1></body></html> |
|
|
|
To generate complex HTML based on non-trivial model data, conditional |
|
and looping constructs like Python's *for* and *if* are generally needed. |
|
*Template engines* support templates of this complexity. |
|
|
|
There are a lot of template engines available for Python which can be used with |
|
or without a `framework`_. Some of these define a plain-text programming |
|
language which is easy to learn, partly because it is limited in scope. |
|
Others use XML, and the template output is guaranteed to be always be valid |
|
XML. There are many other variations. |
|
|
|
Some `frameworks`_ ship their own template engine or recommend one in |
|
particular. In the absence of a reason to use a different template engine, |
|
using the one provided by or recommended by the framework is a good idea. |
|
|
|
Popular template engines include: |
|
|
|
* `Mako <http://www.makotemplates.org/>`_ |
|
* `Genshi <http://genshi.edgewall.org/>`_ |
|
* `Jinja <http://jinja.pocoo.org/>`_ |
|
|
|
.. seealso:: |
|
|
|
There are many template engines competing for attention, because it is |
|
pretty easy to create them in Python. The page `Templating |
|
<https://wiki.python.org/moin/Templating>`_ in the wiki lists a big, |
|
ever-growing number of these. The three listed above are considered "second |
|
generation" template engines and are a good place to start. |
|
|
|
|
|
Data persistence |
|
---------------- |
|
|
|
*Data persistence*, while sounding very complicated, is just about storing data. |
|
This data might be the text of blog entries, the postings on a bulletin board or |
|
the text of a wiki page. There are, of course, a number of different ways to store |
|
information on a web server. |
|
|
|
Often, relational database engines like `MySQL <http://www.mysql.com/>`_ or |
|
`PostgreSQL <http://www.postgresql.org/>`_ are used because of their good |
|
performance when handling very large databases consisting of millions of |
|
entries. There is also a small database engine called `SQLite |
|
<http://www.sqlite.org/>`_, which is bundled with Python in the :mod:`sqlite3` |
|
module, and which uses only one file. It has no other dependencies. For |
|
smaller sites SQLite is just enough. |
|
|
|
Relational databases are *queried* using a language called `SQL |
|
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SQL>`_. Python programmers in general do not |
|
like SQL too much, as they prefer to work with objects. It is possible to save |
|
Python objects into a database using a technology called `ORM |
|
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Object-relational_mapping>`_ (Object Relational |
|
Mapping). ORM translates all object-oriented access into SQL code under the |
|
hood, so the developer does not need to think about it. Most `frameworks`_ use |
|
ORMs, and it works quite well. |
|
|
|
A second possibility is storing data in normal, plain text files (some |
|
times called "flat files"). This is very easy for simple sites, |
|
but can be difficult to get right if the web site is performing many |
|
updates to the stored data. |
|
|
|
A third possibility are object oriented databases (also called "object |
|
databases"). These databases store the object data in a form that closely |
|
parallels the way the objects are structured in memory during program |
|
execution. (By contrast, ORMs store the object data as rows of data in tables |
|
and relations between those rows.) Storing the objects directly has the |
|
advantage that nearly all objects can be saved in a straightforward way, unlike |
|
in relational databases where some objects are very hard to represent. |
|
|
|
`Frameworks`_ often give hints on which data storage method to choose. It is |
|
usually a good idea to stick to the data store recommended by the framework |
|
unless the application has special requirements better satisfied by an |
|
alternate storage mechanism. |
|
|
|
.. seealso:: |
|
|
|
* `Persistence Tools <https://wiki.python.org/moin/PersistenceTools>`_ lists |
|
possibilities on how to save data in the file system. Some of these |
|
modules are part of the standard library |
|
|
|
* `Database Programming <https://wiki.python.org/moin/DatabaseProgramming>`_ |
|
helps with choosing a method for saving data |
|
|
|
* `SQLAlchemy <http://www.sqlalchemy.org/>`_, the most powerful OR-Mapper |
|
for Python, and `Elixir <https://pypi.org/project/Elixir>`_, which makes |
|
SQLAlchemy easier to use |
|
|
|
* `SQLObject <http://www.sqlobject.org/>`_, another popular OR-Mapper |
|
|
|
* `ZODB <https://launchpad.net/zodb>`_ and `Durus |
|
<https://www.mems-exchange.org/software/>`_, two object oriented |
|
databases |
|
|
|
|
|
.. _framework: |
|
|
|
Frameworks |
|
========== |
|
|
|
The process of creating code to run web sites involves writing code to provide |
|
various services. The code to provide a particular service often works the |
|
same way regardless of the complexity or purpose of the web site in question. |
|
Abstracting these common solutions into reusable code produces what are called |
|
"frameworks" for web development. Perhaps the most well-known framework for |
|
web development is Ruby on Rails, but Python has its own frameworks. Some of |
|
these were partly inspired by Rails, or borrowed ideas from Rails, but many |
|
existed a long time before Rails. |
|
|
|
Originally Python web frameworks tended to incorporate all of the services |
|
needed to develop web sites as a giant, integrated set of tools. No two web |
|
frameworks were interoperable: a program developed for one could not be |
|
deployed on a different one without considerable re-engineering work. This led |
|
to the development of "minimalist" web frameworks that provided just the tools |
|
to communicate between the Python code and the http protocol, with all other |
|
services to be added on top via separate components. Some ad hoc standards |
|
were developed that allowed for limited interoperability between frameworks, |
|
such as a standard that allowed different template engines to be used |
|
interchangeably. |
|
|
|
Since the advent of WSGI, the Python web framework world has been evolving |
|
toward interoperability based on the WSGI standard. Now many web frameworks, |
|
whether "full stack" (providing all the tools one needs to deploy the most |
|
complex web sites) or minimalist, or anything in between, are built from |
|
collections of reusable components that can be used with more than one |
|
framework. |
|
|
|
The majority of users will probably want to select a "full stack" framework |
|
that has an active community. These frameworks tend to be well documented, |
|
and provide the easiest path to producing a fully functional web site in |
|
minimal time. |
|
|
|
|
|
Some notable frameworks |
|
----------------------- |
|
|
|
There are an incredible number of frameworks, so they cannot all be covered |
|
here. Instead we will briefly touch on some of the most popular. |
|
|
|
|
|
Django |
|
^^^^^^ |
|
|
|
`Django <https://www.djangoproject.com/>`_ is a framework consisting of several |
|
tightly coupled elements which were written from scratch and work together very |
|
well. It includes an ORM which is quite powerful while being simple to use, |
|
and has a great online administration interface which makes it possible to edit |
|
the data in the database with a browser. The template engine is text-based and |
|
is designed to be usable for page designers who cannot write Python. It |
|
supports template inheritance and filters (which work like Unix pipes). Django |
|
has many handy features bundled, such as creation of RSS feeds or generic views, |
|
which make it possible to create web sites almost without writing any Python code. |
|
|
|
It has a big, international community, the members of which have created many |
|
web sites. There are also a lot of add-on projects which extend Django's normal |
|
functionality. This is partly due to Django's well written `online |
|
documentation <https://docs.djangoproject.com/>`_ and the `Django book |
|
<http://www.djangobook.com/>`_. |
|
|
|
|
|
.. note:: |
|
|
|
Although Django is an MVC-style framework, it names the elements |
|
differently, which is described in the `Django FAQ |
|
<https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/dev/faq/general/#django-appears-to-be-a-mvc-framework-but-you-call-the-controller-the-view-and-the-view-the-template-how-come-you-don-t-use-the-standard-names>`_. |
|
|
|
|
|
TurboGears |
|
^^^^^^^^^^ |
|
|
|
Another popular web framework for Python is `TurboGears |
|
<http://www.turbogears.org/>`_. TurboGears takes the approach of using already |
|
existing components and combining them with glue code to create a seamless |
|
experience. TurboGears gives the user flexibility in choosing components. For |
|
example the ORM and template engine can be changed to use packages different |
|
from those used by default. |
|
|
|
The documentation can be found in the `TurboGears documentation |
|
<https://turbogears.readthedocs.org/>`_, where links to screencasts can be found. |
|
TurboGears has also an active user community which can respond to most related |
|
questions. There is also a `TurboGears book <http://turbogears.org/1.0/docs/TGBooks.html>`_ |
|
published, which is a good starting point. |
|
|
|
The newest version of TurboGears, version 2.0, moves even further in direction |
|
of WSGI support and a component-based architecture. TurboGears 2 is based on |
|
the WSGI stack of another popular component-based web framework, `Pylons |
|
<http://www.pylonsproject.org/>`_. |
|
|
|
|
|
Zope |
|
^^^^ |
|
|
|
The Zope framework is one of the "old original" frameworks. Its current |
|
incarnation in Zope2 is a tightly integrated full-stack framework. One of its |
|
most interesting feature is its tight integration with a powerful object |
|
database called the `ZODB <https://launchpad.net/zodb>`_ (Zope Object Database). |
|
Because of its highly integrated nature, Zope wound up in a somewhat isolated |
|
ecosystem: code written for Zope wasn't very usable outside of Zope, and |
|
vice-versa. To solve this problem the Zope 3 effort was started. Zope 3 |
|
re-engineers Zope as a set of more cleanly isolated components. This effort |
|
was started before the advent of the WSGI standard, but there is WSGI support |
|
for Zope 3 from the `Repoze <http://repoze.org/>`_ project. Zope components |
|
have many years of production use behind them, and the Zope 3 project gives |
|
access to these components to the wider Python community. There is even a |
|
separate framework based on the Zope components: `Grok |
|
<http://grok.zope.org/>`_. |
|
|
|
Zope is also the infrastructure used by the `Plone <https://plone.org/>`_ content |
|
management system, one of the most powerful and popular content management |
|
systems available. |
|
|
|
|
|
Other notable frameworks |
|
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ |
|
|
|
Of course these are not the only frameworks that are available. There are |
|
many other frameworks worth mentioning. |
|
|
|
Another framework that's already been mentioned is `Pylons`_. Pylons is much |
|
like TurboGears, but with an even stronger emphasis on flexibility, which comes |
|
at the cost of being more difficult to use. Nearly every component can be |
|
exchanged, which makes it necessary to use the documentation of every single |
|
component, of which there are many. Pylons builds upon `Paste |
|
<http://pythonpaste.org/>`_, an extensive set of tools which are handy for WSGI. |
|
|
|
And that's still not everything. The most up-to-date information can always be |
|
found in the Python wiki. |
|
|
|
.. seealso:: |
|
|
|
The Python wiki contains an extensive list of `web frameworks |
|
<https://wiki.python.org/moin/WebFrameworks>`_. |
|
|
|
Most frameworks also have their own mailing lists and IRC channels, look out |
|
for these on the projects' web sites. |