| // RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -verify -Wno-c++11-extensions %s |
| |
| struct errc { |
| int v_; |
| operator int() const {return v_;} |
| }; |
| |
| class error_condition |
| { |
| int _val_; |
| public: |
| error_condition() : _val_(0) {} |
| |
| error_condition(int _val) |
| : _val_(_val) {} |
| |
| template <class E> |
| error_condition(E _e) { |
| // make_error_condition must not be typo corrected to error_condition |
| // even though the first declaration of make_error_condition has not |
| // yet been encountered. This was a bug in the first version of the type |
| // name typo correction patch that wasn't noticed until building LLVM with |
| // Clang failed. |
| *this = make_error_condition(_e); |
| } |
| |
| }; |
| |
| inline error_condition make_error_condition(errc _e) { |
| return error_condition(static_cast<int>(_e)); |
| } |
| |
| |
| // Prior to the introduction of a callback object to further filter possible |
| // typo corrections, this example would not trigger a suggestion as "base_type" |
| // is a closer match to "basetype" than is "BaseType" but "base_type" does not |
| // refer to a base class or non-static data member. |
| struct BaseType { }; |
| struct Derived : public BaseType { // expected-note {{base class 'BaseType' specified here}} |
| static int base_type; |
| Derived() : basetype() {} // expected-error{{initializer 'basetype' does not name a non-static data member or base class; did you mean the base class 'BaseType'?}} |
| }; |