Accept over-qualified constructor in MSVC emulation mode

MSVC accepts this:

class A {
  A::A();
};

Clang accepts regular member functions with extra qualification as an MS
extension, but not constructors.  This changes the parser to defer rejecting
qualified constructors so that the same Sema logic can apply to constructors as
regular member functions.  This also improves the error message when MS
extensions are disabled (in my opinion). Before it was:

/Users/jason/Desktop/test.cpp:2:8: error: expected member name or ';' after declaration specifiers
  A::A();
  ~~~~ ^
1 error generated.

After:

/Users/jason/Desktop/test.cpp:2:6: error: extra qualification on member 'A'
  A::A();
  ~~~^
1 error generated.

Patch by Jason Haslam.


git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@174980 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
diff --git a/lib/Parse/ParseDecl.cpp b/lib/Parse/ParseDecl.cpp
index c5e4144..0dd1e0a 100644
--- a/lib/Parse/ParseDecl.cpp
+++ b/lib/Parse/ParseDecl.cpp
@@ -2274,8 +2274,7 @@
         // name, then the code is ill-formed; this interpretation is
         // reinforced by the NAD status of core issue 635.
         TemplateIdAnnotation *TemplateId = takeTemplateIdAnnotation(Next);
-        if ((DSContext == DSC_top_level ||
-             (DSContext == DSC_class && DS.isFriendSpecified())) &&
+        if ((DSContext == DSC_top_level || DSContext == DSC_class) &&
             TemplateId->Name &&
             Actions.isCurrentClassName(*TemplateId->Name, getCurScope(), &SS)) {
           if (isConstructorDeclarator()) {
@@ -2325,8 +2324,7 @@
 
       // If we're in a context where the identifier could be a class name,
       // check whether this is a constructor declaration.
-      if ((DSContext == DSC_top_level ||
-           (DSContext == DSC_class && DS.isFriendSpecified())) &&
+      if ((DSContext == DSC_top_level || DSContext == DSC_class) &&
           Actions.isCurrentClassName(*Next.getIdentifierInfo(), getCurScope(),
                                      &SS)) {
         if (isConstructorDeclarator())
@@ -4445,8 +4443,7 @@
       else if (D.getCXXScopeSpec().isSet())
         AllowConstructorName =
           (D.getContext() == Declarator::FileContext ||
-           (D.getContext() == Declarator::MemberContext &&
-            D.getDeclSpec().isFriendSpecified()));
+           D.getContext() == Declarator::MemberContext);
       else
         AllowConstructorName = (D.getContext() == Declarator::MemberContext);
 
diff --git a/test/CXX/special/class.ctor/p1.cpp b/test/CXX/special/class.ctor/p1.cpp
index 4d82184..23ceeba 100644
--- a/test/CXX/special/class.ctor/p1.cpp
+++ b/test/CXX/special/class.ctor/p1.cpp
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
 // RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -verify %s
-// expected-no-diagnostics
+
 struct X0 {
   struct type { };
 
@@ -41,3 +41,7 @@
 template<typename T> (X1<T>::X1)(double) { }
 template<typename T> X1<T> X1<T>::f1(int) { return 0; }
 template<typename T> X1<T> (X1<T>::f1)(type) { return 0; }
+
+class A {
+  A::A(); // expected-error{{extra qualification on member 'A'}}
+};
diff --git a/test/SemaCXX/MicrosoftExtensions.cpp b/test/SemaCXX/MicrosoftExtensions.cpp
index 6b43ea2..449e24b 100644
--- a/test/SemaCXX/MicrosoftExtensions.cpp
+++ b/test/SemaCXX/MicrosoftExtensions.cpp
@@ -204,3 +204,7 @@
 void f() { int __except = 0; }
 
 void ::f(); // expected-warning{{extra qualification on member 'f'}}
+
+class C {
+  C::C(); // expected-warning{{extra qualification on member 'C'}}
+};