blob: 97a6ca85a64af3139122787ffb86459e85520322 [file] [log] [blame]
page.title=Codelines, Branches, and Releases
@jd:body
<!--
Copyright 2010 The Android Open Source Project
Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
You may obtain a copy of the License at
http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
limitations under the License.
-->
<div id="qv-wrapper">
<div id="qv">
<h2>In this document</h2>
<ol id="auto-toc">
</ol>
</div>
</div>
<p>
The Android Open Source Project maintains a complete software stack intended to be ported by
OEMs and other device implementors to run on actual hardware. To maintain the quality of
Android, Google has contributed full-time engineers, product managers, UI designers, Quality
Assurance, and all the other roles required to bring modern devices to market.
</p>
<p>
Accordingly, we maintain a number of "code lines" to clearly separate the current stable
version of Android from unstable experimental work. We roll the open source administration
and maintenance of the Android code lines into the larger product development cycle.
</p>
<p>
The chart below depicts at a conceptual level how AOSP manages code and releases. We're
referring to these as "code lines" instead of "branches" simply because at any given moment
there may be more than one branch extant for a given "code line". For instance, when a
release is cut, sometimes that will become a new branch in git, and sometimes not, based on
the needs of the moment.
</p>
<ol>
<li>
<p>
At any given moment, there is a current latest release of the Android platform. This
typically takes the form of a branch in the tree.
</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>
Device builders and contributors work with the current latest release, fixing bugs,
launching new devices, experimenting with new features, and so on.
</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>
In parallel, Google works internally on the next version of the Android platform and
framework, working according to the product's needs and goals. We develop the next
version of Android by working with a device partner on a flagship device whose
specifications are chosen to push Android in the direction we believe it should go.
</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>
When the "n+1"th version is ready, it will be published to the public source tree, and
become the new latest release.
</p>
</li>
</ol>
<p>
<img src="{@docRoot}images/code-lines.png" alt="code-line diagram">
</p>
<h2 id="notes-and-explanations">
Notes and Explanations
</h2>
<ul>
<li>
<p>
A <em>release</em> corresponds to a formal version of the Android platform, such as 1.5,
2.1, and so on. Generally speaking, a release of the platform corresponds to a version of
the <code>SdkVersion</code> field used in AndroidManifest.xml files, and defined in
<code>frameworks/base/api</code> in the source tree.
</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>
An <em>upstream</em> project is an open-source project from which the Android stack is
pulling code. These include obvious projects such as the Linux kernel and WebKit, but
over time we are migrating some of the semi-autonomous Android projects (such as Dalvik,
the Android SDK tools, Bionic, and so on) to work as "upstream" projects. Generally,
these projects are developed entirely in the public tree. For some upstream projects,
development is done by contributing directly to the upstream project itself. See <a href=
"submit-patches.html#upstream-projects">Upstream Projects</a> for details. In both cases,
snapshots will be periodically pulled into releases.
</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>
The diagram refers to "Eclair" and "FroYo"; however, they are simply placeholders, and
the diagram actually reflects the overall release and branching strategy.
</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>
At all times, a release code-line (which may actually consist of more than one actual
branch in git) is considered the sole canonical source code for a given Android platform
version. OEMs and other groups building devices should pull only from a release branch.
</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>
We will set up "experimental" code-lines to capture changes from the community, so that
they can be iterated on, with an eye toward stability.
</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>
Changes that prove stable will eventually be pulled into a release branch. Note that this
will only apply to bug fixes, app improvements, and other things that do not affect the
APIs of the platform.
</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>
Changes will be pulled into release branches from upstream projects (including the
Android "upstream" projects) as necessary.
</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>
The "n+1"th version (that is, next major version of the framework and platform APIs) will
be developed by Google internally. See below for details.
</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>
Changes will be pulled from upstream, release, and experimental branches into Google's
private branch as necessary.
</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>
When the platform APIs for the next version have stabilized and been fully tested, Google
will cut a release of the next platform version. (This specifically refers to a new
<code>SdkVersion</code>.) This will also correspond to the internal code-line being made
a public release branch, and the new current platform code-line.
</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>
When a new platform version is cut, a corresponding experimental code-line will be
created at the same time.
</p>
</li>
</ul>
<h2 id="about-private-code-lines">
About Private Codelines
</h2>
<p>
The source management strategy above includes a code-line that Google will keep private. The
reason for this is to focus attention on the current public version of Android.
</p>
<p>
OEMs and other device builders naturally want to ship devices with the latest version of
Android. Similarly, application developers don't want to deal with more extant platform
versions than strictly necessary. Meanwhile, Google retains responsibility for the strategic
direction of Android as a platform and a product. Our approach is based on focusing on a
small number of flagship devices to drive features, and secure protections of Android-related
intellectual property.
</p>
<p>
As a result, Google frequently has possession of confidential information of third parties,
and we must refrain from revealing sensitive features until we've secured the appropriate
protections. Meanwhile, there are real risks to the platform arising from having too many
platform versions extant at once. For these reasons, we have structured the open-source
project -- including third-party contributions -- to focus on the currently-public stable
version of Android. "Deep development" on the next version of the platform will happen in
private, until it's ready to become an official release.
</p>
<p>
We recognize that many contributors will disagree with this approach. We respect that others
may have a different point of view; however, this is the approach that we feel is best, and
the one we've chosen to implement.
</p>