Retry: Adds support for 'ignored-on-host'
Adds a filter mechanism that can exclude property values from being
included in the common value extraction. That is needed to prevent the
snapshot mechanism from generating invalid output for properties that
are ignored on host (and have their values cleared) and which are not
tagged with `android:"arch_variant"`.
Changes:
* Updates the documentation of SdkMemberType to explain what effect
the 'ignored-on-host' tag has.
* Adds some tests for this new mechanism.
Bug: 155628860
Test: m nothing
Change-Id: Ibafdb6e921ba5abe505bd8a91ca5a1d9c9b5d0cb
diff --git a/android/sdk.go b/android/sdk.go
index 36afc3d..e823106 100644
--- a/android/sdk.go
+++ b/android/sdk.go
@@ -351,6 +351,15 @@
// values that differ by arch, fields not tagged as such must have common values across
// all variants.
//
+ // * Additional field tags can be specified on a field that will ignore certain values
+ // for the purpose of common value optimization. A value that is ignored must have the
+ // default value for the property type. This is to ensure that significant value are not
+ // ignored by accident. The purpose of this is to allow the snapshot generation to reflect
+ // the behavior of the runtime. e.g. if a property is ignored on the host then a property
+ // that is common for android can be treated as if it was common for android and host as
+ // the setting for host is ignored anyway.
+ // * `sdk:"ignored-on-host" - this indicates the property is ignored on the host variant.
+ //
// * The sdk module type populates the BpModule structure, creating the arch specific
// structure and calls AddToPropertySet(...) on the properties struct to add the member
// specific properties in the correct place in the structure.
diff --git a/sdk/sdk_test.go b/sdk/sdk_test.go
index 898ecea..ae1a492 100644
--- a/sdk/sdk_test.go
+++ b/sdk/sdk_test.go
@@ -289,9 +289,12 @@
}
extractor := newCommonValueExtractor(common)
- extractor.extractCommonProperties(common, structs)
h := TestHelper{t}
+
+ err := extractor.extractCommonProperties(common, structs)
+ h.AssertDeepEquals("unexpected error", nil, err)
+
h.AssertDeepEquals("common properties not correct",
&testPropertiesStruct{
name: "common",
diff --git a/sdk/update.go b/sdk/update.go
index bcc2c77..991428e 100644
--- a/sdk/update.go
+++ b/sdk/update.go
@@ -1215,11 +1215,26 @@
// struct (or one of its embedded structs).
type fieldAccessorFunc func(structValue reflect.Value) reflect.Value
+// Checks the metadata to determine whether the property should be ignored for the
+// purposes of common value extraction or not.
+type extractorMetadataPredicate func(metadata propertiesContainer) bool
+
+// Indicates whether optimizable properties are provided by a host variant or
+// not.
+type isHostVariant interface {
+ isHostVariant() bool
+}
+
// A property that can be optimized by the commonValueExtractor.
type extractorProperty struct {
// The name of the field for this property.
name string
+ // Filter that can use metadata associated with the properties being optimized
+ // to determine whether the field should be ignored during common value
+ // optimization.
+ filter extractorMetadataPredicate
+
// Retrieves the value on which common value optimization will be performed.
getter fieldAccessorFunc
@@ -1273,6 +1288,20 @@
continue
}
+ var filter extractorMetadataPredicate
+
+ // Add a filter
+ if proptools.HasTag(field, "sdk", "ignored-on-host") {
+ filter = func(metadata propertiesContainer) bool {
+ if m, ok := metadata.(isHostVariant); ok {
+ if m.isHostVariant() {
+ return false
+ }
+ }
+ return true
+ }
+ }
+
// Save a copy of the field index for use in the function.
fieldIndex := f
@@ -1304,6 +1333,7 @@
} else {
property := extractorProperty{
name,
+ filter,
fieldGetter,
reflect.Zero(field.Type),
proptools.HasTag(field, "android", "arch_variant"),
@@ -1372,6 +1402,12 @@
for _, property := range e.properties {
fieldGetter := property.getter
+ filter := property.filter
+ if filter == nil {
+ filter = func(metadata propertiesContainer) bool {
+ return true
+ }
+ }
// Check to see if all the structures have the same value for the field. The commonValue
// is nil on entry to the loop and if it is nil on exit then there is no common value or
@@ -1389,6 +1425,15 @@
itemValue := reflect.ValueOf(container.optimizableProperties())
fieldValue := fieldGetter(itemValue)
+ if !filter(container) {
+ expectedValue := property.emptyValue.Interface()
+ actualValue := fieldValue.Interface()
+ if !reflect.DeepEqual(expectedValue, actualValue) {
+ return fmt.Errorf("field %q is supposed to be ignored for %q but is set to %#v instead of %#v", property, container, actualValue, expectedValue)
+ }
+ continue
+ }
+
if commonValue == nil {
// Use the first value as the commonProperties value.
commonValue = &fieldValue
