Trivial strxfrm coverage improvement.

Test: treehugger
Change-Id: I450bd3324c3f0f8ab95cecebe0f57dc85acc2996
diff --git a/tests/string_test.cpp b/tests/string_test.cpp
index 0ed0598f..53fb18c 100644
--- a/tests/string_test.cpp
+++ b/tests/string_test.cpp
@@ -1592,10 +1592,21 @@
 TEST(STRING_TEST, strxfrm_smoke) {
   const char* src1 = "aab";
   char dst1[16] = {};
-  ASSERT_GT(strxfrm(dst1, src1, sizeof(dst1)), 0U);
+  // Dry run.
+  ASSERT_EQ(strxfrm(dst1, src1, 0), 3U);
+  ASSERT_STREQ(dst1, "");
+  // Really do it.
+  ASSERT_EQ(strxfrm(dst1, src1, sizeof(dst1)), 3U);
+
   const char* src2 = "aac";
   char dst2[16] = {};
-  ASSERT_GT(strxfrm(dst2, src2, sizeof(dst2)), 0U);
+  // Dry run.
+  ASSERT_EQ(strxfrm(dst2, src2, 0), 3U);
+  ASSERT_STREQ(dst2, "");
+  // Really do it.
+  ASSERT_EQ(strxfrm(dst2, src2, sizeof(dst2)), 3U);
+
+  // The "transform" of two different strings should cause different outputs.
   ASSERT_TRUE(strcmp(dst1, dst2) < 0);
 }