blob: ad5fc8ef93ce7b0489966f7261571c036f70d774 [file] [log] [blame]
/*
* Copyright (C) 2015 The Android Open Source Project
*
* Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
* you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
* You may obtain a copy of the License at
*
* http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
*
* Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
* distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
* WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
* See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
* limitations under the License.
*/
public class Main {
public static void assertBooleanEquals(boolean expected, boolean result) {
if (expected != result) {
throw new Error("Expected: " + expected + ", found: " + result);
}
}
public static void assertIntEquals(int expected, int result) {
if (expected != result) {
throw new Error("Expected: " + expected + ", found: " + result);
}
}
public static void assertLongEquals(long expected, long result) {
if (expected != result) {
throw new Error("Expected: " + expected + ", found: " + result);
}
}
public static void assertFloatEquals(float expected, float result) {
if (expected != result) {
throw new Error("Expected: " + expected + ", found: " + result);
}
}
public static void assertDoubleEquals(double expected, double result) {
if (expected != result) {
throw new Error("Expected: " + expected + ", found: " + result);
}
}
/**
* Tiny programs exercising optimizations of arithmetic identities.
*/
/// CHECK-START: long Main.Add0(long) instruction_simplifier (before)
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Arg:j\d+>> ParameterValue
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Const0:j\d+>> LongConstant 0
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Add:j\d+>> Add [<<Const0>>,<<Arg>>]
/// CHECK-DAG: Return [<<Add>>]
/// CHECK-START: long Main.Add0(long) instruction_simplifier (after)
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Arg:j\d+>> ParameterValue
/// CHECK-DAG: Return [<<Arg>>]
/// CHECK-START: long Main.Add0(long) instruction_simplifier (after)
/// CHECK-NOT: Add
public static long Add0(long arg) {
return 0 + arg;
}
/// CHECK-START: int Main.AndAllOnes(int) instruction_simplifier (before)
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Arg:i\d+>> ParameterValue
/// CHECK-DAG: <<ConstF:i\d+>> IntConstant -1
/// CHECK-DAG: <<And:i\d+>> And [<<Arg>>,<<ConstF>>]
/// CHECK-DAG: Return [<<And>>]
/// CHECK-START: int Main.AndAllOnes(int) instruction_simplifier (after)
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Arg:i\d+>> ParameterValue
/// CHECK-DAG: Return [<<Arg>>]
/// CHECK-START: int Main.AndAllOnes(int) instruction_simplifier (after)
/// CHECK-NOT: And
public static int AndAllOnes(int arg) {
return arg & -1;
}
/// CHECK-START: long Main.Div1(long) instruction_simplifier (before)
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Arg:j\d+>> ParameterValue
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Const1:j\d+>> LongConstant 1
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Div:j\d+>> Div [<<Arg>>,<<Const1>>]
/// CHECK-DAG: Return [<<Div>>]
/// CHECK-START: long Main.Div1(long) instruction_simplifier (after)
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Arg:j\d+>> ParameterValue
/// CHECK-DAG: Return [<<Arg>>]
/// CHECK-START: long Main.Div1(long) instruction_simplifier (after)
/// CHECK-NOT: Div
public static long Div1(long arg) {
return arg / 1;
}
/// CHECK-START: int Main.DivN1(int) instruction_simplifier (before)
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Arg:i\d+>> ParameterValue
/// CHECK-DAG: <<ConstN1:i\d+>> IntConstant -1
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Div:i\d+>> Div [<<Arg>>,<<ConstN1>>]
/// CHECK-DAG: Return [<<Div>>]
/// CHECK-START: int Main.DivN1(int) instruction_simplifier (after)
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Arg:i\d+>> ParameterValue
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Neg:i\d+>> Neg [<<Arg>>]
/// CHECK-DAG: Return [<<Neg>>]
/// CHECK-START: int Main.DivN1(int) instruction_simplifier (after)
/// CHECK-NOT: Div
public static int DivN1(int arg) {
return arg / -1;
}
/// CHECK-START: long Main.Mul1(long) instruction_simplifier (before)
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Arg:j\d+>> ParameterValue
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Const1:j\d+>> LongConstant 1
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Mul:j\d+>> Mul [<<Arg>>,<<Const1>>]
/// CHECK-DAG: Return [<<Mul>>]
/// CHECK-START: long Main.Mul1(long) instruction_simplifier (after)
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Arg:j\d+>> ParameterValue
/// CHECK-DAG: Return [<<Arg>>]
/// CHECK-START: long Main.Mul1(long) instruction_simplifier (after)
/// CHECK-NOT: Mul
public static long Mul1(long arg) {
return arg * 1;
}
/// CHECK-START: int Main.MulN1(int) instruction_simplifier (before)
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Arg:i\d+>> ParameterValue
/// CHECK-DAG: <<ConstN1:i\d+>> IntConstant -1
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Mul:i\d+>> Mul [<<Arg>>,<<ConstN1>>]
/// CHECK-DAG: Return [<<Mul>>]
/// CHECK-START: int Main.MulN1(int) instruction_simplifier (after)
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Arg:i\d+>> ParameterValue
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Neg:i\d+>> Neg [<<Arg>>]
/// CHECK-DAG: Return [<<Neg>>]
/// CHECK-START: int Main.MulN1(int) instruction_simplifier (after)
/// CHECK-NOT: Mul
public static int MulN1(int arg) {
return arg * -1;
}
/// CHECK-START: long Main.MulPowerOfTwo128(long) instruction_simplifier (before)
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Arg:j\d+>> ParameterValue
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Const128:j\d+>> LongConstant 128
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Mul:j\d+>> Mul [<<Arg>>,<<Const128>>]
/// CHECK-DAG: Return [<<Mul>>]
/// CHECK-START: long Main.MulPowerOfTwo128(long) instruction_simplifier (after)
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Arg:j\d+>> ParameterValue
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Const7:i\d+>> IntConstant 7
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Shl:j\d+>> Shl [<<Arg>>,<<Const7>>]
/// CHECK-DAG: Return [<<Shl>>]
/// CHECK-START: long Main.MulPowerOfTwo128(long) instruction_simplifier (after)
/// CHECK-NOT: Mul
public static long MulPowerOfTwo128(long arg) {
return arg * 128;
}
/// CHECK-START: int Main.Or0(int) instruction_simplifier (before)
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Arg:i\d+>> ParameterValue
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Const0:i\d+>> IntConstant 0
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Or:i\d+>> Or [<<Arg>>,<<Const0>>]
/// CHECK-DAG: Return [<<Or>>]
/// CHECK-START: int Main.Or0(int) instruction_simplifier (after)
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Arg:i\d+>> ParameterValue
/// CHECK-DAG: Return [<<Arg>>]
/// CHECK-START: int Main.Or0(int) instruction_simplifier (after)
/// CHECK-NOT: Or
public static int Or0(int arg) {
return arg | 0;
}
/// CHECK-START: long Main.OrSame(long) instruction_simplifier (before)
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Arg:j\d+>> ParameterValue
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Or:j\d+>> Or [<<Arg>>,<<Arg>>]
/// CHECK-DAG: Return [<<Or>>]
/// CHECK-START: long Main.OrSame(long) instruction_simplifier (after)
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Arg:j\d+>> ParameterValue
/// CHECK-DAG: Return [<<Arg>>]
/// CHECK-START: long Main.OrSame(long) instruction_simplifier (after)
/// CHECK-NOT: Or
public static long OrSame(long arg) {
return arg | arg;
}
/// CHECK-START: int Main.Shl0(int) instruction_simplifier (before)
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Arg:i\d+>> ParameterValue
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Const0:i\d+>> IntConstant 0
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Shl:i\d+>> Shl [<<Arg>>,<<Const0>>]
/// CHECK-DAG: Return [<<Shl>>]
/// CHECK-START: int Main.Shl0(int) instruction_simplifier (after)
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Arg:i\d+>> ParameterValue
/// CHECK-DAG: Return [<<Arg>>]
/// CHECK-START: int Main.Shl0(int) instruction_simplifier (after)
/// CHECK-NOT: Shl
public static int Shl0(int arg) {
return arg << 0;
}
/// CHECK-START: int Main.Shl1(int) instruction_simplifier (before)
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Arg:i\d+>> ParameterValue
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Const1:i\d+>> IntConstant 1
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Shl:i\d+>> Shl [<<Arg>>,<<Const1>>]
/// CHECK-DAG: Return [<<Shl>>]
/// CHECK-START: int Main.Shl1(int) instruction_simplifier (after)
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Arg:i\d+>> ParameterValue
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Add:i\d+>> Add [<<Arg>>,<<Arg>>]
/// CHECK-DAG: Return [<<Add>>]
/// CHECK-START: int Main.Shl1(int) instruction_simplifier (after)
/// CHECK-NOT: Shl
public static int Shl1(int arg) {
return arg << 1;
}
/// CHECK-START: long Main.Shr0(long) instruction_simplifier (before)
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Arg:j\d+>> ParameterValue
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Const0:i\d+>> IntConstant 0
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Shr:j\d+>> Shr [<<Arg>>,<<Const0>>]
/// CHECK-DAG: Return [<<Shr>>]
/// CHECK-START: long Main.Shr0(long) instruction_simplifier (after)
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Arg:j\d+>> ParameterValue
/// CHECK-DAG: Return [<<Arg>>]
/// CHECK-START: long Main.Shr0(long) instruction_simplifier (after)
/// CHECK-NOT: Shr
public static long Shr0(long arg) {
return arg >> 0;
}
/// CHECK-START: long Main.Sub0(long) instruction_simplifier (before)
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Arg:j\d+>> ParameterValue
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Const0:j\d+>> LongConstant 0
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Sub:j\d+>> Sub [<<Arg>>,<<Const0>>]
/// CHECK-DAG: Return [<<Sub>>]
/// CHECK-START: long Main.Sub0(long) instruction_simplifier (after)
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Arg:j\d+>> ParameterValue
/// CHECK-DAG: Return [<<Arg>>]
/// CHECK-START: long Main.Sub0(long) instruction_simplifier (after)
/// CHECK-NOT: Sub
public static long Sub0(long arg) {
return arg - 0;
}
/// CHECK-START: int Main.SubAliasNeg(int) instruction_simplifier (before)
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Arg:i\d+>> ParameterValue
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Const0:i\d+>> IntConstant 0
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Sub:i\d+>> Sub [<<Const0>>,<<Arg>>]
/// CHECK-DAG: Return [<<Sub>>]
/// CHECK-START: int Main.SubAliasNeg(int) instruction_simplifier (after)
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Arg:i\d+>> ParameterValue
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Neg:i\d+>> Neg [<<Arg>>]
/// CHECK-DAG: Return [<<Neg>>]
/// CHECK-START: int Main.SubAliasNeg(int) instruction_simplifier (after)
/// CHECK-NOT: Sub
public static int SubAliasNeg(int arg) {
return 0 - arg;
}
/// CHECK-START: long Main.UShr0(long) instruction_simplifier (before)
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Arg:j\d+>> ParameterValue
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Const0:i\d+>> IntConstant 0
/// CHECK-DAG: <<UShr:j\d+>> UShr [<<Arg>>,<<Const0>>]
/// CHECK-DAG: Return [<<UShr>>]
/// CHECK-START: long Main.UShr0(long) instruction_simplifier (after)
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Arg:j\d+>> ParameterValue
/// CHECK-DAG: Return [<<Arg>>]
/// CHECK-START: long Main.UShr0(long) instruction_simplifier (after)
/// CHECK-NOT: UShr
public static long UShr0(long arg) {
return arg >>> 0;
}
/// CHECK-START: int Main.Xor0(int) instruction_simplifier (before)
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Arg:i\d+>> ParameterValue
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Const0:i\d+>> IntConstant 0
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Xor:i\d+>> Xor [<<Arg>>,<<Const0>>]
/// CHECK-DAG: Return [<<Xor>>]
/// CHECK-START: int Main.Xor0(int) instruction_simplifier (after)
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Arg:i\d+>> ParameterValue
/// CHECK-DAG: Return [<<Arg>>]
/// CHECK-START: int Main.Xor0(int) instruction_simplifier (after)
/// CHECK-NOT: Xor
public static int Xor0(int arg) {
return arg ^ 0;
}
/// CHECK-START: int Main.XorAllOnes(int) instruction_simplifier (before)
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Arg:i\d+>> ParameterValue
/// CHECK-DAG: <<ConstF:i\d+>> IntConstant -1
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Xor:i\d+>> Xor [<<Arg>>,<<ConstF>>]
/// CHECK-DAG: Return [<<Xor>>]
/// CHECK-START: int Main.XorAllOnes(int) instruction_simplifier (after)
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Arg:i\d+>> ParameterValue
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Not:i\d+>> Not [<<Arg>>]
/// CHECK-DAG: Return [<<Not>>]
/// CHECK-START: int Main.XorAllOnes(int) instruction_simplifier (after)
/// CHECK-NOT: Xor
public static int XorAllOnes(int arg) {
return arg ^ -1;
}
/**
* Test that addition or subtraction operation with both inputs negated are
* optimized to use a single negation after the operation.
* The transformation tested is implemented in
* `InstructionSimplifierVisitor::TryMoveNegOnInputsAfterBinop`.
*/
/// CHECK-START: int Main.AddNegs1(int, int) instruction_simplifier (before)
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Arg1:i\d+>> ParameterValue
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Arg2:i\d+>> ParameterValue
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Neg1:i\d+>> Neg [<<Arg1>>]
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Neg2:i\d+>> Neg [<<Arg2>>]
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Add:i\d+>> Add [<<Neg1>>,<<Neg2>>]
/// CHECK-DAG: Return [<<Add>>]
/// CHECK-START: int Main.AddNegs1(int, int) instruction_simplifier (after)
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Arg1:i\d+>> ParameterValue
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Arg2:i\d+>> ParameterValue
/// CHECK-NOT: Neg
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Add:i\d+>> Add [<<Arg1>>,<<Arg2>>]
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Neg:i\d+>> Neg [<<Add>>]
/// CHECK-DAG: Return [<<Neg>>]
public static int AddNegs1(int arg1, int arg2) {
return -arg1 + -arg2;
}
/**
* This is similar to the test-case AddNegs1, but the negations have
* multiple uses.
* The transformation tested is implemented in
* `InstructionSimplifierVisitor::TryMoveNegOnInputsAfterBinop`.
* The current code won't perform the previous optimization. The
* transformations do not look at other uses of their inputs. As they don't
* know what will happen with other uses, they do not take the risk of
* increasing the register pressure by creating or extending live ranges.
*/
/// CHECK-START: int Main.AddNegs2(int, int) instruction_simplifier (before)
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Arg1:i\d+>> ParameterValue
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Arg2:i\d+>> ParameterValue
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Neg1:i\d+>> Neg [<<Arg1>>]
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Neg2:i\d+>> Neg [<<Arg2>>]
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Add1:i\d+>> Add [<<Neg1>>,<<Neg2>>]
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Add2:i\d+>> Add [<<Neg1>>,<<Neg2>>]
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Or:i\d+>> Or [<<Add1>>,<<Add2>>]
/// CHECK-DAG: Return [<<Or>>]
/// CHECK-START: int Main.AddNegs2(int, int) instruction_simplifier (after)
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Arg1:i\d+>> ParameterValue
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Arg2:i\d+>> ParameterValue
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Neg1:i\d+>> Neg [<<Arg1>>]
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Neg2:i\d+>> Neg [<<Arg2>>]
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Add1:i\d+>> Add [<<Neg1>>,<<Neg2>>]
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Add2:i\d+>> Add [<<Neg1>>,<<Neg2>>]
/// CHECK-NOT: Neg
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Or:i\d+>> Or [<<Add1>>,<<Add2>>]
/// CHECK-DAG: Return [<<Or>>]
/// CHECK-START: int Main.AddNegs2(int, int) GVN (after)
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Arg1:i\d+>> ParameterValue
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Arg2:i\d+>> ParameterValue
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Neg1:i\d+>> Neg [<<Arg1>>]
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Neg2:i\d+>> Neg [<<Arg2>>]
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Add:i\d+>> Add [<<Neg1>>,<<Neg2>>]
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Or:i\d+>> Or [<<Add>>,<<Add>>]
/// CHECK-DAG: Return [<<Or>>]
public static int AddNegs2(int arg1, int arg2) {
int temp1 = -arg1;
int temp2 = -arg2;
return (temp1 + temp2) | (temp1 + temp2);
}
/**
* This follows test-cases AddNegs1 and AddNegs2.
* The transformation tested is implemented in
* `InstructionSimplifierVisitor::TryMoveNegOnInputsAfterBinop`.
* The optimization should not happen if it moves an additional instruction in
* the loop.
*/
/// CHECK-START: long Main.AddNegs3(long, long) instruction_simplifier (before)
// -------------- Arguments and initial negation operations.
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Arg1:j\d+>> ParameterValue
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Arg2:j\d+>> ParameterValue
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Neg1:j\d+>> Neg [<<Arg1>>]
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Neg2:j\d+>> Neg [<<Arg2>>]
/// CHECK: Goto
// -------------- Loop
/// CHECK: SuspendCheck
/// CHECK: <<Add:j\d+>> Add [<<Neg1>>,<<Neg2>>]
/// CHECK: Goto
/// CHECK-START: long Main.AddNegs3(long, long) instruction_simplifier (after)
// -------------- Arguments and initial negation operations.
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Arg1:j\d+>> ParameterValue
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Arg2:j\d+>> ParameterValue
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Neg1:j\d+>> Neg [<<Arg1>>]
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Neg2:j\d+>> Neg [<<Arg2>>]
/// CHECK: Goto
// -------------- Loop
/// CHECK: SuspendCheck
/// CHECK: <<Add:j\d+>> Add [<<Neg1>>,<<Neg2>>]
/// CHECK-NOT: Neg
/// CHECK: Goto
public static long AddNegs3(long arg1, long arg2) {
long res = 0;
long n_arg1 = -arg1;
long n_arg2 = -arg2;
for (long i = 0; i < 1; i++) {
res += n_arg1 + n_arg2 + i;
}
return res;
}
/**
* Test the simplification of an addition with a negated argument into a
* subtraction.
* The transformation tested is implemented in `InstructionSimplifierVisitor::VisitAdd`.
*/
/// CHECK-START: long Main.AddNeg1(long, long) instruction_simplifier (before)
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Arg1:j\d+>> ParameterValue
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Arg2:j\d+>> ParameterValue
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Neg:j\d+>> Neg [<<Arg1>>]
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Add:j\d+>> Add [<<Neg>>,<<Arg2>>]
/// CHECK-DAG: Return [<<Add>>]
/// CHECK-START: long Main.AddNeg1(long, long) instruction_simplifier (after)
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Arg1:j\d+>> ParameterValue
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Arg2:j\d+>> ParameterValue
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Sub:j\d+>> Sub [<<Arg2>>,<<Arg1>>]
/// CHECK-DAG: Return [<<Sub>>]
/// CHECK-START: long Main.AddNeg1(long, long) instruction_simplifier (after)
/// CHECK-NOT: Neg
/// CHECK-NOT: Add
public static long AddNeg1(long arg1, long arg2) {
return -arg1 + arg2;
}
/**
* This is similar to the test-case AddNeg1, but the negation has two uses.
* The transformation tested is implemented in `InstructionSimplifierVisitor::VisitAdd`.
* The current code won't perform the previous optimization. The
* transformations do not look at other uses of their inputs. As they don't
* know what will happen with other uses, they do not take the risk of
* increasing the register pressure by creating or extending live ranges.
*/
/// CHECK-START: long Main.AddNeg2(long, long) instruction_simplifier (before)
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Arg1:j\d+>> ParameterValue
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Arg2:j\d+>> ParameterValue
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Neg:j\d+>> Neg [<<Arg2>>]
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Add1:j\d+>> Add [<<Arg1>>,<<Neg>>]
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Add2:j\d+>> Add [<<Arg1>>,<<Neg>>]
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Res:j\d+>> Or [<<Add1>>,<<Add2>>]
/// CHECK-DAG: Return [<<Res>>]
/// CHECK-START: long Main.AddNeg2(long, long) instruction_simplifier (after)
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Arg1:j\d+>> ParameterValue
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Arg2:j\d+>> ParameterValue
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Neg:j\d+>> Neg [<<Arg2>>]
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Add1:j\d+>> Add [<<Arg1>>,<<Neg>>]
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Add2:j\d+>> Add [<<Arg1>>,<<Neg>>]
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Res:j\d+>> Or [<<Add1>>,<<Add2>>]
/// CHECK-DAG: Return [<<Res>>]
/// CHECK-START: long Main.AddNeg2(long, long) instruction_simplifier (after)
/// CHECK-NOT: Sub
public static long AddNeg2(long arg1, long arg2) {
long temp = -arg2;
return (arg1 + temp) | (arg1 + temp);
}
/**
* Test simplification of the `-(-var)` pattern.
* The transformation tested is implemented in `InstructionSimplifierVisitor::VisitNeg`.
*/
/// CHECK-START: long Main.NegNeg1(long) instruction_simplifier (before)
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Arg:j\d+>> ParameterValue
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Neg1:j\d+>> Neg [<<Arg>>]
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Neg2:j\d+>> Neg [<<Neg1>>]
/// CHECK-DAG: Return [<<Neg2>>]
/// CHECK-START: long Main.NegNeg1(long) instruction_simplifier (after)
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Arg:j\d+>> ParameterValue
/// CHECK-DAG: Return [<<Arg>>]
/// CHECK-START: long Main.NegNeg1(long) instruction_simplifier (after)
/// CHECK-NOT: Neg
public static long NegNeg1(long arg) {
return -(-arg);
}
/**
* Test 'multi-step' simplification, where a first transformation yields a
* new simplification possibility for the current instruction.
* The transformations tested are implemented in `InstructionSimplifierVisitor::VisitNeg`
* and in `InstructionSimplifierVisitor::VisitAdd`.
*/
/// CHECK-START: int Main.NegNeg2(int) instruction_simplifier (before)
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Arg:i\d+>> ParameterValue
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Neg1:i\d+>> Neg [<<Arg>>]
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Neg2:i\d+>> Neg [<<Neg1>>]
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Add:i\d+>> Add [<<Neg1>>,<<Neg2>>]
/// CHECK-DAG: Return [<<Add>>]
/// CHECK-START: int Main.NegNeg2(int) instruction_simplifier (after)
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Arg:i\d+>> ParameterValue
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Sub:i\d+>> Sub [<<Arg>>,<<Arg>>]
/// CHECK-DAG: Return [<<Sub>>]
/// CHECK-START: int Main.NegNeg2(int) instruction_simplifier (after)
/// CHECK-NOT: Neg
/// CHECK-NOT: Add
/// CHECK-START: int Main.NegNeg2(int) constant_folding_after_inlining (after)
/// CHECK: <<Const0:i\d+>> IntConstant 0
/// CHECK-NOT: Neg
/// CHECK-NOT: Add
/// CHECK: Return [<<Const0>>]
public static int NegNeg2(int arg) {
int temp = -arg;
return temp + -temp;
}
/**
* Test another 'multi-step' simplification, where a first transformation
* yields a new simplification possibility for the current instruction.
* The transformations tested are implemented in `InstructionSimplifierVisitor::VisitNeg`
* and in `InstructionSimplifierVisitor::VisitSub`.
*/
/// CHECK-START: long Main.NegNeg3(long) instruction_simplifier (before)
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Arg:j\d+>> ParameterValue
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Const0:j\d+>> LongConstant 0
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Neg:j\d+>> Neg [<<Arg>>]
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Sub:j\d+>> Sub [<<Const0>>,<<Neg>>]
/// CHECK-DAG: Return [<<Sub>>]
/// CHECK-START: long Main.NegNeg3(long) instruction_simplifier (after)
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Arg:j\d+>> ParameterValue
/// CHECK-DAG: Return [<<Arg>>]
/// CHECK-START: long Main.NegNeg3(long) instruction_simplifier (after)
/// CHECK-NOT: Neg
/// CHECK-NOT: Sub
public static long NegNeg3(long arg) {
return 0 - -arg;
}
/**
* Test that a negated subtraction is simplified to a subtraction with its
* arguments reversed.
* The transformation tested is implemented in `InstructionSimplifierVisitor::VisitNeg`.
*/
/// CHECK-START: int Main.NegSub1(int, int) instruction_simplifier (before)
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Arg1:i\d+>> ParameterValue
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Arg2:i\d+>> ParameterValue
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Sub:i\d+>> Sub [<<Arg1>>,<<Arg2>>]
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Neg:i\d+>> Neg [<<Sub>>]
/// CHECK-DAG: Return [<<Neg>>]
/// CHECK-START: int Main.NegSub1(int, int) instruction_simplifier (after)
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Arg1:i\d+>> ParameterValue
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Arg2:i\d+>> ParameterValue
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Sub:i\d+>> Sub [<<Arg2>>,<<Arg1>>]
/// CHECK-DAG: Return [<<Sub>>]
/// CHECK-START: int Main.NegSub1(int, int) instruction_simplifier (after)
/// CHECK-NOT: Neg
public static int NegSub1(int arg1, int arg2) {
return -(arg1 - arg2);
}
/**
* This is similar to the test-case NegSub1, but the subtraction has
* multiple uses.
* The transformation tested is implemented in `InstructionSimplifierVisitor::VisitNeg`.
* The current code won't perform the previous optimization. The
* transformations do not look at other uses of their inputs. As they don't
* know what will happen with other uses, they do not take the risk of
* increasing the register pressure by creating or extending live ranges.
*/
/// CHECK-START: int Main.NegSub2(int, int) instruction_simplifier (before)
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Arg1:i\d+>> ParameterValue
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Arg2:i\d+>> ParameterValue
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Sub:i\d+>> Sub [<<Arg1>>,<<Arg2>>]
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Neg1:i\d+>> Neg [<<Sub>>]
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Neg2:i\d+>> Neg [<<Sub>>]
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Or:i\d+>> Or [<<Neg1>>,<<Neg2>>]
/// CHECK-DAG: Return [<<Or>>]
/// CHECK-START: int Main.NegSub2(int, int) instruction_simplifier (after)
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Arg1:i\d+>> ParameterValue
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Arg2:i\d+>> ParameterValue
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Sub:i\d+>> Sub [<<Arg1>>,<<Arg2>>]
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Neg1:i\d+>> Neg [<<Sub>>]
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Neg2:i\d+>> Neg [<<Sub>>]
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Or:i\d+>> Or [<<Neg1>>,<<Neg2>>]
/// CHECK-DAG: Return [<<Or>>]
public static int NegSub2(int arg1, int arg2) {
int temp = arg1 - arg2;
return -temp | -temp;
}
/**
* Test simplification of the `~~var` pattern.
* The transformation tested is implemented in `InstructionSimplifierVisitor::VisitNot`.
*/
/// CHECK-START: long Main.NotNot1(long) instruction_simplifier (before)
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Arg:j\d+>> ParameterValue
/// CHECK-DAG: <<ConstF1:j\d+>> LongConstant -1
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Xor1:j\d+>> Xor [<<Arg>>,<<ConstF1>>]
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Xor2:j\d+>> Xor [<<Xor1>>,<<ConstF1>>]
/// CHECK-DAG: Return [<<Xor2>>]
/// CHECK-START: long Main.NotNot1(long) instruction_simplifier (after)
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Arg:j\d+>> ParameterValue
/// CHECK-DAG: Return [<<Arg>>]
/// CHECK-START: long Main.NotNot1(long) instruction_simplifier (after)
/// CHECK-NOT: Xor
public static long NotNot1(long arg) {
return ~~arg;
}
/// CHECK-START: int Main.NotNot2(int) instruction_simplifier (before)
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Arg:i\d+>> ParameterValue
/// CHECK-DAG: <<ConstF1:i\d+>> IntConstant -1
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Xor1:i\d+>> Xor [<<Arg>>,<<ConstF1>>]
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Xor2:i\d+>> Xor [<<Xor1>>,<<ConstF1>>]
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Add:i\d+>> Add [<<Xor1>>,<<Xor2>>]
/// CHECK-DAG: Return [<<Add>>]
/// CHECK-START: int Main.NotNot2(int) instruction_simplifier (after)
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Arg:i\d+>> ParameterValue
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Not:i\d+>> Not [<<Arg>>]
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Add:i\d+>> Add [<<Not>>,<<Arg>>]
/// CHECK-DAG: Return [<<Add>>]
/// CHECK-START: int Main.NotNot2(int) instruction_simplifier (after)
/// CHECK-NOT: Xor
public static int NotNot2(int arg) {
int temp = ~arg;
return temp + ~temp;
}
/**
* Test the simplification of a subtraction with a negated argument.
* The transformation tested is implemented in `InstructionSimplifierVisitor::VisitSub`.
*/
/// CHECK-START: int Main.SubNeg1(int, int) instruction_simplifier (before)
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Arg1:i\d+>> ParameterValue
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Arg2:i\d+>> ParameterValue
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Neg:i\d+>> Neg [<<Arg1>>]
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Sub:i\d+>> Sub [<<Neg>>,<<Arg2>>]
/// CHECK-DAG: Return [<<Sub>>]
/// CHECK-START: int Main.SubNeg1(int, int) instruction_simplifier (after)
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Arg1:i\d+>> ParameterValue
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Arg2:i\d+>> ParameterValue
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Add:i\d+>> Add [<<Arg1>>,<<Arg2>>]
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Neg:i\d+>> Neg [<<Add>>]
/// CHECK-DAG: Return [<<Neg>>]
/// CHECK-START: int Main.SubNeg1(int, int) instruction_simplifier (after)
/// CHECK-NOT: Sub
public static int SubNeg1(int arg1, int arg2) {
return -arg1 - arg2;
}
/**
* This is similar to the test-case SubNeg1, but the negation has
* multiple uses.
* The transformation tested is implemented in `InstructionSimplifierVisitor::VisitSub`.
* The current code won't perform the previous optimization. The
* transformations do not look at other uses of their inputs. As they don't
* know what will happen with other uses, they do not take the risk of
* increasing the register pressure by creating or extending live ranges.
*/
/// CHECK-START: int Main.SubNeg2(int, int) instruction_simplifier (before)
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Arg1:i\d+>> ParameterValue
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Arg2:i\d+>> ParameterValue
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Neg:i\d+>> Neg [<<Arg1>>]
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Sub1:i\d+>> Sub [<<Neg>>,<<Arg2>>]
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Sub2:i\d+>> Sub [<<Neg>>,<<Arg2>>]
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Or:i\d+>> Or [<<Sub1>>,<<Sub2>>]
/// CHECK-DAG: Return [<<Or>>]
/// CHECK-START: int Main.SubNeg2(int, int) instruction_simplifier (after)
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Arg1:i\d+>> ParameterValue
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Arg2:i\d+>> ParameterValue
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Neg:i\d+>> Neg [<<Arg1>>]
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Sub1:i\d+>> Sub [<<Neg>>,<<Arg2>>]
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Sub2:i\d+>> Sub [<<Neg>>,<<Arg2>>]
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Or:i\d+>> Or [<<Sub1>>,<<Sub2>>]
/// CHECK-DAG: Return [<<Or>>]
/// CHECK-START: int Main.SubNeg2(int, int) instruction_simplifier (after)
/// CHECK-NOT: Add
public static int SubNeg2(int arg1, int arg2) {
int temp = -arg1;
return (temp - arg2) | (temp - arg2);
}
/**
* This follows test-cases SubNeg1 and SubNeg2.
* The transformation tested is implemented in `InstructionSimplifierVisitor::VisitSub`.
* The optimization should not happen if it moves an additional instruction in
* the loop.
*/
/// CHECK-START: long Main.SubNeg3(long, long) instruction_simplifier (before)
// -------------- Arguments and initial negation operation.
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Arg1:j\d+>> ParameterValue
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Arg2:j\d+>> ParameterValue
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Neg:j\d+>> Neg [<<Arg1>>]
/// CHECK: Goto
// -------------- Loop
/// CHECK: SuspendCheck
/// CHECK: <<Sub:j\d+>> Sub [<<Neg>>,<<Arg2>>]
/// CHECK: Goto
/// CHECK-START: long Main.SubNeg3(long, long) instruction_simplifier (after)
// -------------- Arguments and initial negation operation.
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Arg1:j\d+>> ParameterValue
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Arg2:j\d+>> ParameterValue
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Neg:j\d+>> Neg [<<Arg1>>]
/// CHECK-DAG: Goto
// -------------- Loop
/// CHECK: SuspendCheck
/// CHECK: <<Sub:j\d+>> Sub [<<Neg>>,<<Arg2>>]
/// CHECK-NOT: Neg
/// CHECK: Goto
public static long SubNeg3(long arg1, long arg2) {
long res = 0;
long temp = -arg1;
for (long i = 0; i < 1; i++) {
res += temp - arg2 - i;
}
return res;
}
/// CHECK-START: int Main.EqualTrueRhs(boolean) instruction_simplifier (before)
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Arg:z\d+>> ParameterValue
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Const1:i\d+>> IntConstant 1
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Cond:z\d+>> Equal [<<Arg>>,<<Const1>>]
/// CHECK-DAG: If [<<Cond>>]
/// CHECK-START: int Main.EqualTrueRhs(boolean) instruction_simplifier (after)
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Arg:z\d+>> ParameterValue
/// CHECK-DAG: If [<<Arg>>]
public static int EqualTrueRhs(boolean arg) {
return (arg != true) ? 3 : 5;
}
/// CHECK-START: int Main.EqualTrueLhs(boolean) instruction_simplifier (before)
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Arg:z\d+>> ParameterValue
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Const1:i\d+>> IntConstant 1
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Cond:z\d+>> Equal [<<Const1>>,<<Arg>>]
/// CHECK-DAG: If [<<Cond>>]
/// CHECK-START: int Main.EqualTrueLhs(boolean) instruction_simplifier (after)
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Arg:z\d+>> ParameterValue
/// CHECK-DAG: If [<<Arg>>]
public static int EqualTrueLhs(boolean arg) {
return (true != arg) ? 3 : 5;
}
/// CHECK-START: int Main.EqualFalseRhs(boolean) instruction_simplifier (before)
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Arg:z\d+>> ParameterValue
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Const0:i\d+>> IntConstant 0
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Cond:z\d+>> Equal [<<Arg>>,<<Const0>>]
/// CHECK-DAG: If [<<Cond>>]
/// CHECK-START: int Main.EqualFalseRhs(boolean) instruction_simplifier (after)
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Arg:z\d+>> ParameterValue
/// CHECK-DAG: <<NotArg:z\d+>> BooleanNot [<<Arg>>]
/// CHECK-DAG: If [<<NotArg>>]
public static int EqualFalseRhs(boolean arg) {
return (arg != false) ? 3 : 5;
}
/// CHECK-START: int Main.EqualFalseLhs(boolean) instruction_simplifier (before)
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Arg:z\d+>> ParameterValue
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Const0:i\d+>> IntConstant 0
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Cond:z\d+>> Equal [<<Const0>>,<<Arg>>]
/// CHECK-DAG: If [<<Cond>>]
/// CHECK-START: int Main.EqualFalseLhs(boolean) instruction_simplifier (after)
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Arg:z\d+>> ParameterValue
/// CHECK-DAG: <<NotArg:z\d+>> BooleanNot [<<Arg>>]
/// CHECK-DAG: If [<<NotArg>>]
public static int EqualFalseLhs(boolean arg) {
return (false != arg) ? 3 : 5;
}
/// CHECK-START: int Main.NotEqualTrueRhs(boolean) instruction_simplifier (before)
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Arg:z\d+>> ParameterValue
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Const1:i\d+>> IntConstant 1
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Cond:z\d+>> NotEqual [<<Arg>>,<<Const1>>]
/// CHECK-DAG: If [<<Cond>>]
/// CHECK-START: int Main.NotEqualTrueRhs(boolean) instruction_simplifier (after)
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Arg:z\d+>> ParameterValue
/// CHECK-DAG: <<NotArg:z\d+>> BooleanNot [<<Arg>>]
/// CHECK-DAG: If [<<NotArg>>]
public static int NotEqualTrueRhs(boolean arg) {
return (arg == true) ? 3 : 5;
}
/// CHECK-START: int Main.NotEqualTrueLhs(boolean) instruction_simplifier (before)
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Arg:z\d+>> ParameterValue
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Const1:i\d+>> IntConstant 1
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Cond:z\d+>> NotEqual [<<Const1>>,<<Arg>>]
/// CHECK-DAG: If [<<Cond>>]
/// CHECK-START: int Main.NotEqualTrueLhs(boolean) instruction_simplifier (after)
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Arg:z\d+>> ParameterValue
/// CHECK-DAG: <<NotArg:z\d+>> BooleanNot [<<Arg>>]
/// CHECK-DAG: If [<<NotArg>>]
public static int NotEqualTrueLhs(boolean arg) {
return (true == arg) ? 3 : 5;
}
/// CHECK-START: int Main.NotEqualFalseRhs(boolean) instruction_simplifier (before)
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Arg:z\d+>> ParameterValue
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Const0:i\d+>> IntConstant 0
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Cond:z\d+>> NotEqual [<<Arg>>,<<Const0>>]
/// CHECK-DAG: If [<<Cond>>]
/// CHECK-START: int Main.NotEqualFalseRhs(boolean) instruction_simplifier (after)
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Arg:z\d+>> ParameterValue
/// CHECK-DAG: If [<<Arg>>]
public static int NotEqualFalseRhs(boolean arg) {
return (arg == false) ? 3 : 5;
}
/// CHECK-START: int Main.NotEqualFalseLhs(boolean) instruction_simplifier (before)
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Arg:z\d+>> ParameterValue
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Const0:i\d+>> IntConstant 0
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Cond:z\d+>> NotEqual [<<Const0>>,<<Arg>>]
/// CHECK-DAG: If [<<Cond>>]
/// CHECK-START: int Main.NotEqualFalseLhs(boolean) instruction_simplifier (after)
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Arg:z\d+>> ParameterValue
/// CHECK-DAG: If [<<Arg>>]
public static int NotEqualFalseLhs(boolean arg) {
return (false == arg) ? 3 : 5;
}
/*
* Test simplification of double Boolean negation. Note that sometimes
* both negations can be removed but we only expect the simplifier to
* remove the second.
*/
/// CHECK-START: boolean Main.NotNotBool(boolean) instruction_simplifier_after_types (before)
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Arg:z\d+>> ParameterValue
/// CHECK-DAG: <<NotArg:z\d+>> BooleanNot [<<Arg>>]
/// CHECK-DAG: <<NotNotArg:z\d+>> BooleanNot [<<NotArg>>]
/// CHECK-DAG: Return [<<NotNotArg>>]
/// CHECK-START: boolean Main.NotNotBool(boolean) instruction_simplifier_after_types (after)
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Arg:z\d+>> ParameterValue
/// CHECK-DAG: BooleanNot [<<Arg>>]
/// CHECK-DAG: Return [<<Arg>>]
/// CHECK-START: boolean Main.NotNotBool(boolean) instruction_simplifier_after_types (after)
/// CHECK: BooleanNot
/// CHECK-NOT: BooleanNot
public static boolean NegateValue(boolean arg) {
return !arg;
}
public static boolean NotNotBool(boolean arg) {
return !(NegateValue(arg));
}
/// CHECK-START: float Main.Div2(float) instruction_simplifier (before)
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Arg:f\d+>> ParameterValue
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Const2:f\d+>> FloatConstant 2
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Div:f\d+>> Div [<<Arg>>,<<Const2>>]
/// CHECK-DAG: Return [<<Div>>]
/// CHECK-START: float Main.Div2(float) instruction_simplifier (after)
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Arg:f\d+>> ParameterValue
/// CHECK-DAG: <<ConstP5:f\d+>> FloatConstant 0.5
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Mul:f\d+>> Mul [<<Arg>>,<<ConstP5>>]
/// CHECK-DAG: Return [<<Mul>>]
/// CHECK-START: float Main.Div2(float) instruction_simplifier (after)
/// CHECK-NOT: Div
public static float Div2(float arg) {
return arg / 2.0f;
}
/// CHECK-START: double Main.Div2(double) instruction_simplifier (before)
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Arg:d\d+>> ParameterValue
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Const2:d\d+>> DoubleConstant 2
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Div:d\d+>> Div [<<Arg>>,<<Const2>>]
/// CHECK-DAG: Return [<<Div>>]
/// CHECK-START: double Main.Div2(double) instruction_simplifier (after)
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Arg:d\d+>> ParameterValue
/// CHECK-DAG: <<ConstP5:d\d+>> DoubleConstant 0.5
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Mul:d\d+>> Mul [<<Arg>>,<<ConstP5>>]
/// CHECK-DAG: Return [<<Mul>>]
/// CHECK-START: double Main.Div2(double) instruction_simplifier (after)
/// CHECK-NOT: Div
public static double Div2(double arg) {
return arg / 2.0;
}
/// CHECK-START: float Main.DivMP25(float) instruction_simplifier (before)
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Arg:f\d+>> ParameterValue
/// CHECK-DAG: <<ConstMP25:f\d+>> FloatConstant -0.25
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Div:f\d+>> Div [<<Arg>>,<<ConstMP25>>]
/// CHECK-DAG: Return [<<Div>>]
/// CHECK-START: float Main.DivMP25(float) instruction_simplifier (after)
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Arg:f\d+>> ParameterValue
/// CHECK-DAG: <<ConstM4:f\d+>> FloatConstant -4
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Mul:f\d+>> Mul [<<Arg>>,<<ConstM4>>]
/// CHECK-DAG: Return [<<Mul>>]
/// CHECK-START: float Main.DivMP25(float) instruction_simplifier (after)
/// CHECK-NOT: Div
public static float DivMP25(float arg) {
return arg / -0.25f;
}
/// CHECK-START: double Main.DivMP25(double) instruction_simplifier (before)
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Arg:d\d+>> ParameterValue
/// CHECK-DAG: <<ConstMP25:d\d+>> DoubleConstant -0.25
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Div:d\d+>> Div [<<Arg>>,<<ConstMP25>>]
/// CHECK-DAG: Return [<<Div>>]
/// CHECK-START: double Main.DivMP25(double) instruction_simplifier (after)
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Arg:d\d+>> ParameterValue
/// CHECK-DAG: <<ConstM4:d\d+>> DoubleConstant -4
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Mul:d\d+>> Mul [<<Arg>>,<<ConstM4>>]
/// CHECK-DAG: Return [<<Mul>>]
/// CHECK-START: double Main.DivMP25(double) instruction_simplifier (after)
/// CHECK-NOT: Div
public static double DivMP25(double arg) {
return arg / -0.25f;
}
public static void main(String[] args) {
int arg = 123456;
assertLongEquals(Add0(arg), arg);
assertIntEquals(AndAllOnes(arg), arg);
assertLongEquals(Div1(arg), arg);
assertIntEquals(DivN1(arg), -arg);
assertLongEquals(Mul1(arg), arg);
assertIntEquals(MulN1(arg), -arg);
assertLongEquals(MulPowerOfTwo128(arg), (128 * arg));
assertIntEquals(Or0(arg), arg);
assertLongEquals(OrSame(arg), arg);
assertIntEquals(Shl0(arg), arg);
assertLongEquals(Shr0(arg), arg);
assertLongEquals(Sub0(arg), arg);
assertIntEquals(SubAliasNeg(arg), -arg);
assertLongEquals(UShr0(arg), arg);
assertIntEquals(Xor0(arg), arg);
assertIntEquals(XorAllOnes(arg), ~arg);
assertIntEquals(AddNegs1(arg, arg + 1), -(arg + arg + 1));
assertIntEquals(AddNegs2(arg, arg + 1), -(arg + arg + 1));
assertLongEquals(AddNegs3(arg, arg + 1), -(2 * arg + 1));
assertLongEquals(AddNeg1(arg, arg + 1), 1);
assertLongEquals(AddNeg2(arg, arg + 1), -1);
assertLongEquals(NegNeg1(arg), arg);
assertIntEquals(NegNeg2(arg), 0);
assertLongEquals(NegNeg3(arg), arg);
assertIntEquals(NegSub1(arg, arg + 1), 1);
assertIntEquals(NegSub2(arg, arg + 1), 1);
assertLongEquals(NotNot1(arg), arg);
assertIntEquals(NotNot2(arg), -1);
assertIntEquals(SubNeg1(arg, arg + 1), -(arg + arg + 1));
assertIntEquals(SubNeg2(arg, arg + 1), -(arg + arg + 1));
assertLongEquals(SubNeg3(arg, arg + 1), -(2 * arg + 1));
assertIntEquals(EqualTrueRhs(true), 5);
assertIntEquals(EqualTrueLhs(true), 5);
assertIntEquals(EqualFalseRhs(true), 3);
assertIntEquals(EqualFalseLhs(true), 3);
assertIntEquals(NotEqualTrueRhs(true), 3);
assertIntEquals(NotEqualTrueLhs(true), 3);
assertIntEquals(NotEqualFalseRhs(true), 5);
assertIntEquals(NotEqualFalseLhs(true), 5);
assertBooleanEquals(NotNotBool(true), true);
assertBooleanEquals(NotNotBool(false), false);
assertFloatEquals(Div2(100.0f), 50.0f);
assertDoubleEquals(Div2(150.0), 75.0);
assertFloatEquals(DivMP25(100.0f), -400.0f);
assertDoubleEquals(DivMP25(150.0), -600.0);
assertLongEquals(Shl1(100), 200);
}
}