| Processor boosting control | 
 |  | 
 | 	- information for users - | 
 |  | 
 | Quick guide for the impatient: | 
 | -------------------- | 
 | /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpufreq/boost | 
 | controls the boost setting for the whole system. You can read and write | 
 | that file with either "0" (boosting disabled) or "1" (boosting allowed). | 
 | Reading or writing 1 does not mean that the system is boosting at this | 
 | very moment, but only that the CPU _may_ raise the frequency at it's | 
 | discretion. | 
 | -------------------- | 
 |  | 
 | Introduction | 
 | ------------- | 
 | Some CPUs support a functionality to raise the operating frequency of | 
 | some cores in a multi-core package if certain conditions apply, mostly | 
 | if the whole chip is not fully utilized and below it's intended thermal | 
 | budget. This is done without operating system control by a combination | 
 | of hardware and firmware. | 
 | On Intel CPUs this is called "Turbo Boost", AMD calls it "Turbo-Core", | 
 | in technical documentation "Core performance boost". In Linux we use | 
 | the term "boost" for convenience. | 
 |  | 
 | Rationale for disable switch | 
 | ---------------------------- | 
 |  | 
 | Though the idea is to just give better performance without any user | 
 | intervention, sometimes the need arises to disable this functionality. | 
 | Most systems offer a switch in the (BIOS) firmware to disable the | 
 | functionality at all, but a more fine-grained and dynamic control would | 
 | be desirable: | 
 | 1. While running benchmarks, reproducible results are important. Since | 
 |    the boosting functionality depends on the load of the whole package, | 
 |    single thread performance can vary. By explicitly disabling the boost | 
 |    functionality at least for the benchmark's run-time the system will run | 
 |    at a fixed frequency and results are reproducible again. | 
 | 2. To examine the impact of the boosting functionality it is helpful | 
 |    to do tests with and without boosting. | 
 | 3. Boosting means overclocking the processor, though under controlled | 
 |    conditions. By raising the frequency and the voltage the processor | 
 |    will consume more power than without the boosting, which may be | 
 |    undesirable for instance for mobile users. Disabling boosting may | 
 |    save power here, though this depends on the workload. | 
 |  | 
 |  | 
 | User controlled switch | 
 | ---------------------- | 
 |  | 
 | To allow the user to toggle the boosting functionality, the acpi-cpufreq | 
 | driver exports a sysfs knob to disable it. There is a file: | 
 | /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpufreq/boost | 
 | which can either read "0" (boosting disabled) or "1" (boosting enabled). | 
 | Reading the file is always supported, even if the processor does not | 
 | support boosting. In this case the file will be read-only and always | 
 | reads as "0". Explicitly changing the permissions and writing to that | 
 | file anyway will return EINVAL. | 
 |  | 
 | On supported CPUs one can write either a "0" or a "1" into this file. | 
 | This will either disable the boost functionality on all cores in the | 
 | whole system (0) or will allow the hardware to boost at will (1). | 
 |  | 
 | Writing a "1" does not explicitly boost the system, but just allows the | 
 | CPU (and the firmware) to boost at their discretion. Some implementations | 
 | take external factors like the chip's temperature into account, so | 
 | boosting once does not necessarily mean that it will occur every time | 
 | even using the exact same software setup. | 
 |  | 
 |  | 
 | AMD legacy cpb switch | 
 | --------------------- | 
 | The AMD powernow-k8 driver used to support a very similar switch to | 
 | disable or enable the "Core Performance Boost" feature of some AMD CPUs. | 
 | This switch was instantiated in each CPU's cpufreq directory | 
 | (/sys/devices/system/cpu[0-9]*/cpufreq) and was called "cpb". | 
 | Though the per CPU existence hints at a more fine grained control, the | 
 | actual implementation only supported a system-global switch semantics, | 
 | which was simply reflected into each CPU's file. Writing a 0 or 1 into it | 
 | would pull the other CPUs to the same state. | 
 | For compatibility reasons this file and its behavior is still supported | 
 | on AMD CPUs, though it is now protected by a config switch | 
 | (X86_ACPI_CPUFREQ_CPB). On Intel CPUs this file will never be created, | 
 | even with the config option set. | 
 | This functionality is considered legacy and will be removed in some future | 
 | kernel version. | 
 |  | 
 | More fine grained boosting control | 
 | ---------------------------------- | 
 |  | 
 | Technically it is possible to switch the boosting functionality at least | 
 | on a per package basis, for some CPUs even per core. Currently the driver | 
 | does not support it, but this may be implemented in the future. |