| /* |
| * Copyright © 2012 Intel Corporation |
| * |
| * Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a |
| * copy of this software and associated documentation files (the "Software"), |
| * to deal in the Software without restriction, including without limitation |
| * the rights to use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense, |
| * and/or sell copies of the Software, and to permit persons to whom the |
| * Software is furnished to do so, subject to the following conditions: |
| * |
| * The above copyright notice and this permission notice (including the next |
| * paragraph) shall be included in all copies or substantial portions of the |
| * Software. |
| * |
| * THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR |
| * IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY, |
| * FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT. IN NO EVENT SHALL |
| * THE AUTHORS OR COPYRIGHT HOLDERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER |
| * LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING |
| * FROM, OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR OTHER DEALINGS |
| * IN THE SOFTWARE. |
| * |
| * Authors: |
| * Eric Anholt <eric@anholt.net> |
| * |
| */ |
| |
| #include "brw_fs_cfg.h" |
| #include "brw_fs_live_variables.h" |
| |
| using namespace brw; |
| |
| /** @file brw_fs_live_variables.cpp |
| * |
| * Support for computing at the basic block level which variables |
| * (virtual GRFs in our case) are live at entry and exit. |
| * |
| * See Muchnik's Advanced Compiler Design and Implementation, section |
| * 14.1 (p444). |
| */ |
| |
| /** |
| * Sets up the use[] and def[] arrays. |
| * |
| * The basic-block-level live variable analysis needs to know which |
| * variables get used before they're completely defined, and which |
| * variables are completely defined before they're used. |
| */ |
| void |
| fs_live_variables::setup_def_use() |
| { |
| int ip = 0; |
| |
| for (int b = 0; b < cfg->num_blocks; b++) { |
| fs_bblock *block = cfg->blocks[b]; |
| |
| assert(ip == block->start_ip); |
| if (b > 0) |
| assert(cfg->blocks[b - 1]->end_ip == ip - 1); |
| |
| for (fs_inst *inst = block->start; |
| inst != block->end->next; |
| inst = (fs_inst *)inst->next) { |
| |
| /* Set use[] for this instruction */ |
| for (unsigned int i = 0; i < 3; i++) { |
| if (inst->src[i].file == GRF) { |
| int reg = inst->src[i].reg; |
| |
| if (!bd[b].def[reg]) |
| bd[b].use[reg] = true; |
| } |
| } |
| |
| /* Check for unconditional writes to whole registers. These |
| * are the things that screen off preceding definitions of a |
| * variable, and thus qualify for being in def[]. |
| */ |
| if (inst->dst.file == GRF && |
| inst->regs_written() == v->virtual_grf_sizes[inst->dst.reg] && |
| !inst->predicated && |
| !inst->force_uncompressed && |
| !inst->force_sechalf) { |
| int reg = inst->dst.reg; |
| if (!bd[b].use[reg]) |
| bd[b].def[reg] = true; |
| } |
| |
| ip++; |
| } |
| } |
| } |
| |
| /** |
| * The algorithm incrementally sets bits in liveout and livein, |
| * propagating it through control flow. It will eventually terminate |
| * because it only ever adds bits, and stops when no bits are added in |
| * a pass. |
| */ |
| void |
| fs_live_variables::compute_live_variables() |
| { |
| bool cont = true; |
| |
| while (cont) { |
| cont = false; |
| |
| for (int b = 0; b < cfg->num_blocks; b++) { |
| /* Update livein */ |
| for (int i = 0; i < num_vars; i++) { |
| if (bd[b].use[i] || (bd[b].liveout[i] && !bd[b].def[i])) { |
| if (!bd[b].livein[i]) { |
| bd[b].livein[i] = true; |
| cont = true; |
| } |
| } |
| } |
| |
| /* Update liveout */ |
| foreach_list(block_node, &cfg->blocks[b]->children) { |
| fs_bblock_link *link = (fs_bblock_link *)block_node; |
| fs_bblock *block = link->block; |
| |
| for (int i = 0; i < num_vars; i++) { |
| if (bd[block->block_num].livein[i] && !bd[b].liveout[i]) { |
| bd[b].liveout[i] = true; |
| cont = true; |
| } |
| } |
| } |
| } |
| } |
| } |
| |
| fs_live_variables::fs_live_variables(fs_visitor *v, fs_cfg *cfg) |
| : v(v), cfg(cfg) |
| { |
| mem_ctx = ralloc_context(cfg->mem_ctx); |
| |
| num_vars = v->virtual_grf_count; |
| bd = rzalloc_array(mem_ctx, struct block_data, cfg->num_blocks); |
| |
| for (int i = 0; i < cfg->num_blocks; i++) { |
| bd[i].def = rzalloc_array(mem_ctx, bool, num_vars); |
| bd[i].use = rzalloc_array(mem_ctx, bool, num_vars); |
| bd[i].livein = rzalloc_array(mem_ctx, bool, num_vars); |
| bd[i].liveout = rzalloc_array(mem_ctx, bool, num_vars); |
| } |
| |
| setup_def_use(); |
| compute_live_variables(); |
| } |
| |
| fs_live_variables::~fs_live_variables() |
| { |
| ralloc_free(mem_ctx); |
| } |
| |
| #define MAX_INSTRUCTION (1 << 30) |
| |
| void |
| fs_visitor::calculate_live_intervals() |
| { |
| int num_vars = this->virtual_grf_count; |
| |
| if (this->live_intervals_valid) |
| return; |
| |
| int *def = ralloc_array(mem_ctx, int, num_vars); |
| int *use = ralloc_array(mem_ctx, int, num_vars); |
| ralloc_free(this->virtual_grf_def); |
| ralloc_free(this->virtual_grf_use); |
| this->virtual_grf_def = def; |
| this->virtual_grf_use = use; |
| |
| for (int i = 0; i < num_vars; i++) { |
| def[i] = MAX_INSTRUCTION; |
| use[i] = -1; |
| } |
| |
| /* Start by setting up the intervals with no knowledge of control |
| * flow. |
| */ |
| int ip = 0; |
| foreach_list(node, &this->instructions) { |
| fs_inst *inst = (fs_inst *)node; |
| |
| for (unsigned int i = 0; i < 3; i++) { |
| if (inst->src[i].file == GRF) { |
| int reg = inst->src[i].reg; |
| |
| use[reg] = ip; |
| } |
| } |
| |
| if (inst->dst.file == GRF) { |
| int reg = inst->dst.reg; |
| |
| def[reg] = MIN2(def[reg], ip); |
| } |
| |
| ip++; |
| } |
| |
| /* Now, extend those intervals using our analysis of control flow. */ |
| fs_cfg cfg(this); |
| fs_live_variables livevars(this, &cfg); |
| |
| for (int b = 0; b < cfg.num_blocks; b++) { |
| for (int i = 0; i < num_vars; i++) { |
| if (livevars.bd[b].livein[i]) { |
| def[i] = MIN2(def[i], cfg.blocks[b]->start_ip); |
| use[i] = MAX2(use[i], cfg.blocks[b]->start_ip); |
| } |
| |
| if (livevars.bd[b].liveout[i]) { |
| def[i] = MIN2(def[i], cfg.blocks[b]->end_ip); |
| use[i] = MAX2(use[i], cfg.blocks[b]->end_ip); |
| } |
| } |
| } |
| |
| this->live_intervals_valid = true; |
| |
| /* Note in the non-control-flow code above, that we only take def[] as the |
| * first store, and use[] as the last use. We use this in dead code |
| * elimination, to determine when a store never gets used. However, we |
| * also use these arrays to answer the virtual_grf_interferes() question |
| * (live interval analysis), which is used for register coalescing and |
| * register allocation. |
| * |
| * So, there's a conflict over what the array should mean: if use[] |
| * considers a def after the last use, then the dead code elimination pass |
| * never does anything (and it's an important pass!). But if we don't |
| * include dead code, then virtual_grf_interferes() lies and we'll do |
| * horrible things like coalesce the register that is dead-code-written |
| * into another register that was live across the dead write (causing the |
| * use of the second register to take the dead write's source value instead |
| * of the coalesced MOV's source value). |
| * |
| * To resolve the conflict, immediately after calculating live intervals, |
| * detect dead code, nuke it, and if we changed anything, calculate again |
| * before returning to the caller. Now we happen to produce def[] and |
| * use[] arrays that will work for virtual_grf_interferes(). |
| */ |
| if (dead_code_eliminate()) |
| calculate_live_intervals(); |
| } |
| |
| bool |
| fs_visitor::virtual_grf_interferes(int a, int b) |
| { |
| int a_def = this->virtual_grf_def[a], a_use = this->virtual_grf_use[a]; |
| int b_def = this->virtual_grf_def[b], b_use = this->virtual_grf_use[b]; |
| |
| /* If there's dead code (def but not use), it would break our test |
| * unless we consider it used. |
| */ |
| if ((a_use == -1 && a_def != MAX_INSTRUCTION) || |
| (b_use == -1 && b_def != MAX_INSTRUCTION)) { |
| return true; |
| } |
| |
| int start = MAX2(a_def, b_def); |
| int end = MIN2(a_use, b_use); |
| |
| /* If the register is used to store 16 values of less than float |
| * size (only the case for pixel_[xy]), then we can't allocate |
| * another dword-sized thing to that register that would be used in |
| * the same instruction. This is because when the GPU decodes (for |
| * example): |
| * |
| * (declare (in ) vec4 gl_FragCoord@0x97766a0) |
| * add(16) g6<1>F g6<8,8,1>UW 0.5F { align1 compr }; |
| * |
| * it's actually processed as: |
| * add(8) g6<1>F g6<8,8,1>UW 0.5F { align1 }; |
| * add(8) g7<1>F g6.8<8,8,1>UW 0.5F { align1 sechalf }; |
| * |
| * so our second half values in g6 got overwritten in the first |
| * half. |
| */ |
| if (c->dispatch_width == 16 && (this->pixel_x.reg == a || |
| this->pixel_x.reg == b || |
| this->pixel_y.reg == a || |
| this->pixel_y.reg == b)) { |
| return start <= end; |
| } |
| |
| return start < end; |
| } |