blob: 91a1fd35c9d25a6b05f12cdd0c34256b718363b6 [file] [log] [blame]
/*
* Copyright (c) 2008, 2018, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved.
* DO NOT ALTER OR REMOVE COPYRIGHT NOTICES OR THIS FILE HEADER.
*
* This code is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it
* under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 only, as
* published by the Free Software Foundation.
*
* This code is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but WITHOUT
* ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of MERCHANTABILITY or
* FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU General Public License
* version 2 for more details (a copy is included in the LICENSE file that
* accompanied this code).
*
* You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License version
* 2 along with this work; if not, write to the Free Software Foundation,
* Inc., 51 Franklin St, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA 02110-1301 USA.
*
* Please contact Oracle, 500 Oracle Parkway, Redwood Shores, CA 94065 USA
* or visit www.oracle.com if you need additional information or have any
* questions.
*/
/*
* @test
*
* @summary converted from VM Testbase jit/t/t100.
* VM Testbase keywords: [jit, quick]
*
* @library /vmTestbase
* /test/lib
* @run driver jdk.test.lib.FileInstaller . .
* @build jit.t.t100.t100
* @run driver ExecDriver --java jit.t.t100.t100
*/
package jit.t.t100;
/*
This test check it a JIT can still detect stack overflow. Method
invocation overhead is expensive in Java and improving it is a
nobel cause for a JIT. JITs just have to be careful that they
don't loose some error handling ability in doing so.
*/
import java.lang.*;
import nsk.share.TestFailure;
import nsk.share.GoldChecker;
class t100 {
public static final GoldChecker goldChecker = new GoldChecker( "t100" );
public static void main(String[] args) {
try {
recurse(1);
} catch (StackOverflowError e) {
t100.goldChecker.println("Test PASSES");
}
t100.goldChecker.check();
}
static int recurse(int n) {
if (n != 0) {
return recurse(n+1);
}
return 0;
}
}