Read VSR level from correct property. am: e5364d7617 am: 527c55f1c4

Original change: https://googleplex-android-review.googlesource.com/c/platform/hardware/interfaces/+/18931908

Change-Id: Ie9e5d3387980e23cb513e0bdbc6c7976478156c6
Signed-off-by: Automerger Merge Worker <android-build-automerger-merge-worker@system.gserviceaccount.com>
diff --git a/keymaster/4.0/vts/functional/keymaster_hidl_hal_test.cpp b/keymaster/4.0/vts/functional/keymaster_hidl_hal_test.cpp
index bdaaf96..fb5048a 100644
--- a/keymaster/4.0/vts/functional/keymaster_hidl_hal_test.cpp
+++ b/keymaster/4.0/vts/functional/keymaster_hidl_hal_test.cpp
@@ -388,25 +388,28 @@
 }
 
 int get_vsr_api_level() {
-    int api_level = ::android::base::GetIntProperty("ro.board.api_level", -1);
-    if (api_level == -1) {
-        api_level = ::android::base::GetIntProperty("ro.board.first_api_level", -1);
+    int vendor_api_level = ::android::base::GetIntProperty("ro.vendor.api_level", -1);
+    if (vendor_api_level != -1) {
+        return vendor_api_level;
     }
-    if (api_level == -1) {
-        api_level = ::android::base::GetIntProperty("ro.vndk.version", -1);
+
+    // Android S and older devices do not define ro.vendor.api_level
+    vendor_api_level = ::android::base::GetIntProperty("ro.board.api_level", -1);
+    if (vendor_api_level == -1) {
+        vendor_api_level = ::android::base::GetIntProperty("ro.board.first_api_level", -1);
     }
-    // We really should have a VSR API level by now.  But on cuttlefish, and perhaps other weird
-    // devices, we may not.  So, we use the SDK first or current API level if needed.  If this goes
-    // wrong, it should go wrong in the direction of being too strict rather than too lenient, which
-    // should provoke someone to examine why we don't have proper VSR API level properties.
-    if (api_level == -1) {
-        api_level = ::android::base::GetIntProperty("ro.product.first_api_level", -1);
+
+    int product_api_level = ::android::base::GetIntProperty("ro.product.first_api_level", -1);
+    if (product_api_level == -1) {
+        product_api_level = ::android::base::GetIntProperty("ro.build.version.sdk", -1);
+        EXPECT_NE(product_api_level, -1) << "Could not find ro.build.version.sdk";
     }
-    if (api_level == -1) {
-        api_level = ::android::base::GetIntProperty("ro.build.version.sdk", -1);
+
+    // VSR API level is the minimum of vendor_api_level and product_api_level.
+    if (vendor_api_level == -1 || vendor_api_level > product_api_level) {
+        return product_api_level;
     }
-    EXPECT_NE(api_level, -1) << "Could not find a VSR level, or equivalent.";
-    return api_level;
+    return vendor_api_level;
 }
 
 bool is_gsi() {
diff --git a/security/keymint/aidl/vts/functional/KeyMintAidlTestBase.cpp b/security/keymint/aidl/vts/functional/KeyMintAidlTestBase.cpp
index 33945fd..46db4f0 100644
--- a/security/keymint/aidl/vts/functional/KeyMintAidlTestBase.cpp
+++ b/security/keymint/aidl/vts/functional/KeyMintAidlTestBase.cpp
@@ -1461,25 +1461,28 @@
 }
 
 int get_vsr_api_level() {
-    int api_level = ::android::base::GetIntProperty("ro.board.api_level", -1);
-    if (api_level == -1) {
-        api_level = ::android::base::GetIntProperty("ro.board.first_api_level", -1);
+    int vendor_api_level = ::android::base::GetIntProperty("ro.vendor.api_level", -1);
+    if (vendor_api_level != -1) {
+        return vendor_api_level;
     }
-    if (api_level == -1) {
-        api_level = ::android::base::GetIntProperty("ro.vndk.version", -1);
+
+    // Android S and older devices do not define ro.vendor.api_level
+    vendor_api_level = ::android::base::GetIntProperty("ro.board.api_level", -1);
+    if (vendor_api_level == -1) {
+        vendor_api_level = ::android::base::GetIntProperty("ro.board.first_api_level", -1);
     }
-    // We really should have a VSR API level by now.  But on cuttlefish, and perhaps other weird
-    // devices, we may not.  So, we use the SDK first or current API level if needed.  If this goes
-    // wrong, it should go wrong in the direction of being too strict rather than too lenient, which
-    // should provoke someone to examine why we don't have proper VSR API level properties.
-    if (api_level == -1) {
-        api_level = ::android::base::GetIntProperty("ro.product.first_api_level", -1);
+
+    int product_api_level = ::android::base::GetIntProperty("ro.product.first_api_level", -1);
+    if (product_api_level == -1) {
+        product_api_level = ::android::base::GetIntProperty("ro.build.version.sdk", -1);
+        EXPECT_NE(product_api_level, -1) << "Could not find ro.build.version.sdk";
     }
-    if (api_level == -1) {
-        api_level = ::android::base::GetIntProperty("ro.build.version.sdk", -1);
+
+    // VSR API level is the minimum of vendor_api_level and product_api_level.
+    if (vendor_api_level == -1 || vendor_api_level > product_api_level) {
+        return product_api_level;
     }
-    EXPECT_NE(api_level, -1) << "Could not find a VSR level, or equivalent.";
-    return api_level;
+    return vendor_api_level;
 }
 
 bool is_gsi_image() {