[Clang][CodeGen][X86] don't coerce int128 into `{i64,i64}` for SysV-like ABIs (#135230)

Currently, clang coerces (u)int128_t to two i64 IR parameters when they
are passed in registers. This leads to broken debug info for them after
applying SROA+InstCombine. SROA generates IR like this
([godbolt](https://godbolt.org/z/YrTa4chfc)):
```llvm
define dso_local { i64, i64 } @add(i64 noundef %a.coerce0, i64 noundef %a.coerce1)  {
entry:
  %a.sroa.2.0.insert.ext = zext i64 %a.coerce1 to i128
  %a.sroa.2.0.insert.shift = shl nuw i128 %a.sroa.2.0.insert.ext, 64
  %a.sroa.0.0.insert.ext = zext i64 %a.coerce0 to i128
  %a.sroa.0.0.insert.insert = or i128 %a.sroa.2.0.insert.shift, %a.sroa.0.0.insert.ext
    #dbg_value(i128 %a.sroa.0.0.insert.insert, !17, !DIExpression(), !18)
// ...
!17 = !DILocalVariable(name: "a", arg: 1, scope: !10, file: !11, line: 1, type: !14)
// ...
```
  
and InstCombine then removes the `or`, moving it into the
`DIExpression`, and the `shl` at which point the debug info salvaging in
`Transforms/Local` replaces the arguments with `poison` as it does not
allow constants larger than 64 bit in `DIExpression`s.
  
I'm working under the assumption that there is interest in fixing this.
If not, please tell me.
By not coercing `int128_t`s into `{i64, i64}` but keeping them as
`i128`, the debug info stays intact and SelectionDAG then generates two
`DW_OP_LLVM_fragment` expressions for the two corresponding argument
registers.

Given that the ABI code for x64 seems to not coerce the argument when it
is passed on the stack, it should not lead to any problems keeping it as
an `i128` when it is passed in registers.

Alternatively, this could be fixed by checking if a constant value fits
in 64 bits in the debug info salvaging code and then extending the value
on the expression stack to the necessary width. This fixes InstCombine
breaking the debug info but then SelectionDAG removes the expression and
that seems significantly more complex to debug.

Another fix may be to generate `DW_OP_LLVM_fragment` expressions when
removing the `or` as it gets marked as disjoint by InstCombine. However,
I don't know if the KnownBits information is still available at the time
the `or` gets removed and it would probably require refactoring of the
debug info salvaging code as that currently only seems to replace single
expressions and is not designed to support generating new debug records.

Converting `(u)int128_t` arguments to `i128` in the IR seems like the
simpler solution, if it doesn't cause any ABI issues.
7 files changed
tree: 4cedd1129164a17dc17e91f62748202c15f20d2d
  1. .ci/
  2. .github/
  3. bolt/
  4. clang/
  5. clang-tools-extra/
  6. cmake/
  7. compiler-rt/
  8. cross-project-tests/
  9. flang/
  10. flang-rt/
  11. libc/
  12. libclc/
  13. libcxx/
  14. libcxxabi/
  15. libunwind/
  16. lld/
  17. lldb/
  18. llvm/
  19. llvm-libgcc/
  20. mlir/
  21. offload/
  22. openmp/
  23. polly/
  24. runtimes/
  25. third-party/
  26. utils/
  27. .clang-format
  28. .clang-format-ignore
  29. .clang-tidy
  30. .git-blame-ignore-revs
  31. .gitattributes
  32. .gitignore
  33. .mailmap
  34. CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md
  35. CONTRIBUTING.md
  36. LICENSE.TXT
  37. pyproject.toml
  38. README.md
  39. SECURITY.md
README.md

The LLVM Compiler Infrastructure

OpenSSF Scorecard OpenSSF Best Practices libc++

Welcome to the LLVM project!

This repository contains the source code for LLVM, a toolkit for the construction of highly optimized compilers, optimizers, and run-time environments.

The LLVM project has multiple components. The core of the project is itself called “LLVM”. This contains all of the tools, libraries, and header files needed to process intermediate representations and convert them into object files. Tools include an assembler, disassembler, bitcode analyzer, and bitcode optimizer.

C-like languages use the Clang frontend. This component compiles C, C++, Objective-C, and Objective-C++ code into LLVM bitcode -- and from there into object files, using LLVM.

Other components include: the libc++ C++ standard library, the LLD linker, and more.

Getting the Source Code and Building LLVM

Consult the Getting Started with LLVM page for information on building and running LLVM.

For information on how to contribute to the LLVM project, please take a look at the Contributing to LLVM guide.

Getting in touch

Join the LLVM Discourse forums, Discord chat, LLVM Office Hours or Regular sync-ups.

The LLVM project has adopted a code of conduct for participants to all modes of communication within the project.