[RISCV] Correct alignment of one-active (de)interleave cases (#150052)
Noticed this while going to rewrite the load case as a DAG combine. I
don't have a test case which demonstrates this leading to a miscompile,
but it seems like it could be possible.
diff --git a/llvm/lib/Target/RISCV/RISCVInterleavedAccess.cpp b/llvm/lib/Target/RISCV/RISCVInterleavedAccess.cpp
index 25817b6..878401e 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/Target/RISCV/RISCVInterleavedAccess.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/Target/RISCV/RISCVInterleavedAccess.cpp
@@ -232,6 +232,7 @@
Builder.CreateIntrinsic(Intrinsic::experimental_vp_strided_load,
{VTy, BasePtr->getType(), Stride->getType()},
{BasePtr, Stride, Mask, VL});
+ Alignment = commonAlignment(Alignment, Indices[0] * ScalarSizeInBytes);
CI->addParamAttr(0,
Attribute::getWithAlignment(CI->getContext(), Alignment));
Shuffles[0]->replaceAllUsesWith(CI);
@@ -303,8 +304,9 @@
Intrinsic::experimental_vp_strided_store,
{Data->getType(), BasePtr->getType(), Stride->getType()},
{Data, BasePtr, Stride, Mask, VL});
+ Align Alignment = commonAlignment(SI->getAlign(), Index * ScalarSizeInBytes);
CI->addParamAttr(
- 1, Attribute::getWithAlignment(CI->getContext(), SI->getAlign()));
+ 1, Attribute::getWithAlignment(CI->getContext(), Alignment));
return true;
}