intel/fs: Don't use NoDDClk/NoDDClr for split SHUFFLEs
When I copied and pasted the code from MOV_INDIRECT for handling the
dependency controls, I missed a subtle difference between MOV_INDIRECT
and SHUFFLE. Specifically, MOV_INDIRECT gets lowered to a narrow
instruction on Gen7 by the SIMD width lowering whereas SHUFFLE has to
split it in the generator. Therefore, the check safety check for
whether or not we can use dependency control has to be based on the
lowered width rather than the width of the original instruction.
Fixes: a8ac61b0ee2fd "intel/fs: NoMask initialize the address..."
Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/issues/3593
Reviewed-by: Matt Turner <mattst88@gmail.com>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/6989>
1 file changed
