blob: 215ffa62370a4ec697afec9935a4af8cc83c539b [file] [log] [blame]
/*
* Copyright (C) 2009 The Guava Authors
*
* Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
* you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
* You may obtain a copy of the License at
*
* http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
*
* Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
* distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
* WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
* See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
* limitations under the License.
*/
package com.google.common.collect;
import com.google.gwt.user.client.rpc.SerializationException;
import com.google.gwt.user.client.rpc.SerializationStreamReader;
import com.google.gwt.user.client.rpc.SerializationStreamWriter;
/**
* Even though {@link ImmutableSortedMap} cannot be instantiated, we still need a custom field
* serializer. TODO(cpovirk): why? Does it help if ensure that the GWT and non-GWT classes have the
* same fields? Is that worth the trouble?
*
* @author Chris Povirk
*/
public final class ImmutableSortedMap_CustomFieldSerializer {
public static void deserialize(
SerializationStreamReader reader, ImmutableSortedMap<?, ?> instance) {}
public static ImmutableSortedMap<?, ?> instantiate(SerializationStreamReader reader)
throws SerializationException {
return ImmutableSortedMap_CustomFieldSerializerBase.instantiate(reader);
}
public static void serialize(SerializationStreamWriter writer, ImmutableSortedMap<?, ?> instance)
throws SerializationException {
ImmutableSortedMap_CustomFieldSerializerBase.serialize(writer, instance);
}
}