Do not model loads from complex types, since we don't accurately model the imaginary and real parts yet.

Fixes false positive reported in <rdar://problem/12964481>.

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@171987 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
diff --git a/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Core/RegionStore.cpp b/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Core/RegionStore.cpp
index 9d66c16..ffdb971 100644
--- a/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Core/RegionStore.cpp
+++ b/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Core/RegionStore.cpp
@@ -1133,6 +1133,11 @@
   const TypedValueRegion *R = cast<TypedValueRegion>(MR);
   QualType RTy = R->getValueType();
 
+  // FIXME: we do not yet model the parts of a complex type, so treat the
+  // whole thing as "unknown".
+  if (RTy->isAnyComplexType())
+    return UnknownVal();
+
   // FIXME: We should eventually handle funny addressing.  e.g.:
   //
   //   int x = ...;
diff --git a/test/Analysis/misc-ps-region-store.cpp b/test/Analysis/misc-ps-region-store.cpp
index 7b7b8bd..de70d3b 100644
--- a/test/Analysis/misc-ps-region-store.cpp
+++ b/test/Analysis/misc-ps-region-store.cpp
@@ -705,3 +705,19 @@
    *p = 0xDEADBEEF; // no-warning
   }
 }
+
+// The analyzer currently does not model complex types.  Test that the load
+// from 'x' is not flagged as being uninitialized.
+typedef __complex__ float _ComplexT;
+void rdar12964481(_ComplexT *y) {
+   _ComplexT x;
+   __real__ x = 1.0;
+   __imag__ x = 1.0;
+   *y *= x; // no-warning
+}
+void rdar12964481_b(_ComplexT *y) {
+   _ComplexT x;
+   // Eventually this should be a warning.
+   *y *= x; // no-warning
+}
+