Google GitGoogle Git
Sign in
android/kernel/common/e12432318607e4cf57d4b446f59e71761a005af1
commit
e12432318607e4cf57d4b446f59e71761a005af1
[log]
author
Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Thu Feb 13 15:08:24 2020 -0800
committer
Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Fri Feb 21 16:00:25 2020 +0000
tree
7c0129a36d2a6945e8feb063c861856be5a32c77
parent
5f378fd56aa3988be21e859254a2d72628d044c6 [diff]
ANDROID: ufs, block: fix crypto power management and move into block layer

The call to pm_runtime_get_sync() in ufshcd_program_key() can deadlock
because it waits for the UFS controller to be resumed, but it can itself
be reached while resuming the UFS controller via:

- ufshcd_runtime_resume()
  - ufshcd_resume()
    - ufshcd_reset_and_restore()
      - ufshcd_host_reset_and_restore()
        - ufshcd_hba_enable()
          - ufshcd_hba_execute_hce()
            - ufshcd_hba_start()
              - ufshcd_crypto_enable()
                - keyslot_manager_reprogram_all_keys()
                  - ufshcd_crypto_keyslot_program()
                    - ufshcd_program_key()

But pm_runtime_get_sync() *is* needed when evicting a key.  Also, on
pre-4.20 kernels it's needed when programming a keyslot for a bio since
the block layer used to resume the device in a different place.

Thus, it's hard for drivers to know what to do in .keyslot_program() and
.keyslot_evict().  In old kernels it may even be impossible unless we
were to pass more information down from the keyslot_manager.

There's also another possible deadlock: keyslot programming and eviction
take ksm->lock for write and then resume the device, which may result in
ksm->lock being taken again via the above call stack.  To fix this, we
should resume the device before taking ksm->lock.

Fix these problems by moving to a better design where the block layer
(namely, the keyslot manager) handles runtime power management instead
of drivers.  This is analogous to the block layer's existing runtime
power management support (blk-pm), which handles resuming devices when
bios are submitted to them so that drivers don't need to handle it.

Test: Tested on coral with:
        echo 5 > /sys/bus/platform/devices/1d84000.ufshc/rpm_lvl
        sleep 30
        touch /data && sync  # hangs before this fix
  Also verified via kvm-xfstests that blk-crypto-fallback continues
  to work both with and without CONFIG_PM=y.

Bug: 137270441
Bug: 149368295
Change-Id: I6bc9fb81854afe7edf490d71796ee68a61f7cbc8
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
5 files changed
tree: 7c0129a36d2a6945e8feb063c861856be5a32c77
  1. arch/
  2. block/
  3. certs/
  4. crypto/
  5. Documentation/
  6. drivers/
  7. fs/
  8. include/
  9. init/
  10. ipc/
  11. kernel/
  12. lib/
  13. LICENSES/
  14. mm/
  15. net/
  16. samples/
  17. scripts/
  18. security/
  19. sound/
  20. tools/
  21. usr/
  22. virt/
  23. .clang-format
  24. .cocciconfig
  25. .get_maintainer.ignore
  26. .gitattributes
  27. .gitignore
  28. .mailmap
  29. abi_gki_aarch64.xml
  30. abi_gki_aarch64_cuttlefish_whitelist
  31. abi_gki_aarch64_db845c_whitelist
  32. abi_gki_aarch64_unisoc_whitelist
  33. abi_gki_aarch64_whitelist
  34. build.config.aarch64
  35. build.config.allmodconfig
  36. build.config.allmodconfig.aarch64
  37. build.config.allmodconfig.x86_64
  38. build.config.common
  39. build.config.cuttlefish.aarch64
  40. build.config.cuttlefish.x86_64
  41. build.config.db845c
  42. build.config.gki
  43. build.config.gki.aarch64
  44. build.config.gki.x86_64
  45. build.config.x86_64
  46. COPYING
  47. CREDITS
  48. cuttlefish.fragment
  49. Kbuild
  50. Kconfig
  51. MAINTAINERS
  52. Makefile
  53. README
  54. README.md
README.md

How do I submit patches to Android Common Kernels

  1. BEST: Make all of your changes to upstream Linux. If appropriate, backport to the stable releases. These patches will be merged automatically in the corresponding common kernels. If the patch is already in upstream Linux, post a backport of the patch that conforms to the patch requirements below.

  2. LESS GOOD: Develop your patches out-of-tree (from an upstream Linux point-of-view). Unless these are fixing an Android-specific bug, these are very unlikely to be accepted unless they have been coordinated with kernel-team@android.com. If you want to proceed, post a patch that conforms to the patch requirements below.

Common Kernel patch requirements

  • All patches must conform to the Linux kernel coding standards and pass script/checkpatch.pl
  • Patches shall not break gki_defconfig or allmodconfig builds for arm, arm64, x86, x86_64 architectures (see https://source.android.com/setup/build/building-kernels)
  • If the patch is not merged from an upstream branch, the subject must be tagged with the type of patch: UPSTREAM:, BACKPORT:, FROMGIT:, FROMLIST:, or ANDROID:.
  • All patches must have a Change-Id: tag (see https://gerrit-review.googlesource.com/Documentation/user-changeid.html)
  • If an Android bug has been assigned, there must be a Bug: tag.
  • All patches must have a Signed-off-by: tag by the author and the submitter

Additional requirements are listed below based on patch type

Requirements for backports from mainline Linux: UPSTREAM:, BACKPORT:

  • If the patch is a cherry-pick from Linux mainline with no changes at all
    • tag the patch subject with UPSTREAM:.
    • add upstream commit information with a (cherry-picked from ...) line
    • Example:
      • if the upstream commit message is
        important patch from upstream

        This is the detailed description of the important patch

        Signed-off-by: Fred Jones <fred.jones@foo.org>

    - then Joe Smith would upload the patch for the common kernel as

        UPSTREAM: important patch from upstream

        This is the detailed description of the important patch

        Signed-off-by: Fred Jones <fred.jones@foo.org>

        Bug: 135791357
        Change-Id: I4caaaa566ea080fa148c5e768bb1a0b6f7201c01
        (cherry-picked from c31e73121f4c1ec41143423ac6ce3ce6dafdcec1)
        Signed-off-by: Joe Smith <joe.smith@foo.org>
  • If the patch requires any changes from the upstream version, tag the patch with BACKPORT: instead of UPSTREAM:.
    • use the same tags as UPSTREAM:
    • add comments about the changes under the (cherry-picked from ...) line
    • Example:
        BACKPORT: important patch from upstream

        This is the detailed description of the important patch

        Signed-off-by: Fred Jones <fred.jones@foo.org>

        Bug: 135791357
        Change-Id: I4caaaa566ea080fa148c5e768bb1a0b6f7201c01
        (cherry-picked from c31e73121f4c1ec41143423ac6ce3ce6dafdcec1)
        [ Resolved minor conflict in drivers/foo/bar.c ]
        Signed-off-by: Joe Smith <joe.smith@foo.org>

Requirements for other backports: FROMGIT:, FROMLIST:,

  • If the patch has been merged into an upstream maintainer tree, but has not yet been merged into Linux mainline
    • tag the patch subject with FROMGIT:
    • add info on where the patch came from as (cherry picked from commit <sha1> <repo> <branch>). This must be a stable maintainer branch (not rebased, so don't use linux-next for example).
    • if changes were required, use BACKPORT: FROMGIT:
    • Example:
      • if the commit message in the maintainer tree is
        important patch from upstream

        This is the detailed description of the important patch

        Signed-off-by: Fred Jones <fred.jones@foo.org>

    - then Joe Smith would upload the patch for the common kernel as

        FROMGIT: important patch from upstream

        This is the detailed description of the important patch

        Signed-off-by: Fred Jones <fred.jones@foo.org>

        Bug: 135791357
        (cherry picked from commit 878a2fd9de10b03d11d2f622250285c7e63deace
         https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/foo/bar.git test-branch)
        Change-Id: I4caaaa566ea080fa148c5e768bb1a0b6f7201c01
        Signed-off-by: Joe Smith <joe.smith@foo.org>
  • If the patch has been submitted to LKML, but not accepted into any maintainer tree
    • tag the patch subject with FROMLIST:
    • add a Link: tag with a link to the submittal on lore.kernel.org
    • if changes were required, use BACKPORT: FROMLIST:
    • Example:
        FROMLIST: important patch from upstream

        This is the detailed description of the important patch

        Signed-off-by: Fred Jones <fred.jones@foo.org>

        Bug: 135791357
        Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190619171517.GA17557@someone.com/
        Change-Id: I4caaaa566ea080fa148c5e768bb1a0b6f7201c01
        Signed-off-by: Joe Smith <joe.smith@foo.org>

Requirements for Android-specific patches: ANDROID:

  • If the patch is fixing a bug to Android-specific code
    • tag the patch subject with ANDROID:
    • add a Fixes: tag that cites the patch with the bug
    • Example:
        ANDROID: fix android-specific bug in foobar.c

        This is the detailed description of the important fix

        Fixes: 1234abcd2468 ("foobar: add cool feature")
        Change-Id: I4caaaa566ea080fa148c5e768bb1a0b6f7201c01
        Signed-off-by: Joe Smith <joe.smith@foo.org>
  • If the patch is a new feature
    • tag the patch subject with ANDROID:
    • add a Bug: tag with the Android bug (required for android-specific features)