BACKPORT: sched_ext: Use SCX_TASK_READY test instead of tryget_task_struct() during class switch

ddf7233fcab6 ("sched/ext: Fix invalid task state transitions on class
switch") added tryget_task_struct() test during scx_enable()'s class
switching loop. The reason for the addition was to avoid enabling tasks
which skipped prep in the previous loop due to being dead.

While tryget_task_struct() does work for this purpose as tasks that fail
tryget always will fail it, it's a bit roundabout. A more direct way is
testing whether the task is in READY state. Switch to testing
SCX_TASK_READY directly.

BackPort Reason: This upstream patch can fixes a potential deadlock
issue during class switch within scx_ops_enable().

During class switch, scx increments task's usage via
tryget_task_struct(), and later decrements it via put_task_struct(). If
the task is already in TASK_DEAD state, there is a risk that scx could
bring the usage down to zero, triggering __put_task_struct(). This
sequence may lead to a deadlock through the following chain:

```
static int scx_ops_enable(struct sched_ext_ops *ops, struct bpf_link *link)
{
    percpu_down_write(&scx_fork_rwsem);

    // Step1: hold scx_tasks_lock
    scx_task_iter_start(&sti);

    // Step2: hold rq lock & pi lock
    while ((p = scx_task_iter_next_locked(&sti))) {

        // p->usage is 1 but p is exiting.
        if (!tryget_task_struct(p))
            continue;

        // doing class switch

        // Step3:
        //  If p->usage become zero, __put_task_struct() will be called,
        //  and then acquire scx_tasks_lock again in sched_ext_free().
        put_task_struct(p);
    }
    scx_task_iter_stop(&sti);
    percpu_up_write(&scx_fork_rwsem);
}
```

CallStack:
        vmlinux          queued_spin_lock_slowpath() + 140
        vmlinux          _raw_spin_lock_irqsave() + 144
        vmlinux          sched_ext_free() + 44
        vmlinux          __put_task_struct() + 56
        vmlinux          bpf_scx_reg() + 2256

Bug: 479683877
Change-Id: I340f514d97eba7c628982a39ebb5e6b351704759
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
(cherry picked from commit b7d4b28db7da89de1d03316c4e67b5a47390fcd3)
[xieliujie: Resolved minor conflict in kernel/sched/ext.c ]
Signed-off-by: xieliujie <xieliujie@xiaomi.corp-partner.google.com>
1 file changed
tree: fdad1e7a66fdad1dad9209d8a07585c41ab41cd3
  1. arch/
  2. block/
  3. certs/
  4. crypto/
  5. Documentation/
  6. drivers/
  7. fs/
  8. gki/
  9. include/
  10. init/
  11. io_uring/
  12. ipc/
  13. kernel/
  14. lib/
  15. LICENSES/
  16. mm/
  17. net/
  18. rust/
  19. samples/
  20. scripts/
  21. security/
  22. sound/
  23. tools/
  24. usr/
  25. virt/
  26. .clang-format
  27. .clippy.toml
  28. .cocciconfig
  29. .editorconfig
  30. .get_maintainer.ignore
  31. .gitattributes
  32. .gitignore
  33. .mailmap
  34. .rustfmt.toml
  35. abi.bzl
  36. BUILD.bazel
  37. build.config.aarch64
  38. build.config.arm
  39. build.config.common
  40. build.config.constants
  41. build.config.db845c
  42. build.config.gki
  43. build.config.gki.aarch64
  44. build.config.gki.x86_64
  45. build.config.rockpi4
  46. build.config.x86_64
  47. COPYING
  48. CREDITS
  49. Kbuild
  50. Kconfig
  51. Kconfig.ext
  52. MAINTAINERS
  53. Makefile
  54. modules.bzl
  55. OWNERS
  56. OWNERS_DrNo
  57. README
  58. README.md
README.md

How do I submit patches to Android Common Kernels

  1. BEST: Make all of your changes to upstream Linux. If appropriate, backport to the stable releases. These patches will be merged automatically in the corresponding common kernels. If the patch is already in upstream Linux, post a backport of the patch that conforms to the patch requirements below.

    • Do not send patches upstream that contain only symbol exports. To be considered for upstream Linux, additions of EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL() require an in-tree modular driver that uses the symbol -- so include the new driver or changes to an existing driver in the same patchset as the export.
    • When sending patches upstream, the commit message must contain a clear case for why the patch is needed and beneficial to the community. Enabling out-of-tree drivers or functionality is not a persuasive case.
  2. LESS GOOD: Develop your patches out-of-tree (from an upstream Linux point-of-view). Unless these are fixing an Android-specific bug, these are very unlikely to be accepted unless they have been coordinated with kernel-team@android.com. If you want to proceed, post a patch that conforms to the patch requirements below.

Common Kernel patch requirements

  • All patches must conform to the Linux kernel coding standards and pass scripts/checkpatch.pl
  • Patches shall not break gki_defconfig or allmodconfig builds for arm, arm64, x86, x86_64 architectures (see https://source.android.com/setup/build/building-kernels)
  • If the patch is not merged from an upstream branch, the subject must be tagged with the type of patch: UPSTREAM:, BACKPORT:, FROMGIT:, FROMLIST:, or ANDROID:.
  • All patches must have a Change-Id: tag (see https://gerrit-review.googlesource.com/Documentation/user-changeid.html)
  • If an Android bug has been assigned, there must be a Bug: tag.
  • All patches must have a Signed-off-by: tag by the author and the submitter

Additional requirements are listed below based on patch type

Requirements for backports from mainline Linux: UPSTREAM:, BACKPORT:

  • If the patch is a cherry-pick from Linux mainline with no changes at all
    • tag the patch subject with UPSTREAM:.
    • add upstream commit information with a (cherry picked from commit ...) line
    • Example:
      • if the upstream commit message is
        important patch from upstream

        This is the detailed description of the important patch

        Signed-off-by: Fred Jones <fred.jones@foo.org>
  • then Joe Smith would upload the patch for the common kernel as
        UPSTREAM: important patch from upstream

        This is the detailed description of the important patch

        Signed-off-by: Fred Jones <fred.jones@foo.org>

        Bug: 135791357
        Change-Id: I4caaaa566ea080fa148c5e768bb1a0b6f7201c01
        (cherry picked from commit c31e73121f4c1ec41143423ac6ce3ce6dafdcec1)
        Signed-off-by: Joe Smith <joe.smith@foo.org>
  • If the patch requires any changes from the upstream version, tag the patch with BACKPORT: instead of UPSTREAM:.
    • use the same tags as UPSTREAM:
    • add comments about the changes under the (cherry picked from commit ...) line
    • Example:
        BACKPORT: important patch from upstream

        This is the detailed description of the important patch

        Signed-off-by: Fred Jones <fred.jones@foo.org>

        Bug: 135791357
        Change-Id: I4caaaa566ea080fa148c5e768bb1a0b6f7201c01
        (cherry picked from commit c31e73121f4c1ec41143423ac6ce3ce6dafdcec1)
        [joe: Resolved minor conflict in drivers/foo/bar.c ]
        Signed-off-by: Joe Smith <joe.smith@foo.org>

Requirements for other backports: FROMGIT:, FROMLIST:,

  • If the patch has been merged into an upstream maintainer tree, but has not yet been merged into Linux mainline
    • tag the patch subject with FROMGIT:
    • add info on where the patch came from as (cherry picked from commit <sha1> <repo> <branch>). This must be a stable maintainer branch (not rebased, so don't use linux-next for example).
    • if changes were required, use BACKPORT: FROMGIT:
    • Example:
      • if the commit message in the maintainer tree is
        important patch from upstream

        This is the detailed description of the important patch

        Signed-off-by: Fred Jones <fred.jones@foo.org>
  • then Joe Smith would upload the patch for the common kernel as
        FROMGIT: important patch from upstream

        This is the detailed description of the important patch

        Signed-off-by: Fred Jones <fred.jones@foo.org>

        Bug: 135791357
        (cherry picked from commit 878a2fd9de10b03d11d2f622250285c7e63deace
         https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/foo/bar.git test-branch)
        Change-Id: I4caaaa566ea080fa148c5e768bb1a0b6f7201c01
        Signed-off-by: Joe Smith <joe.smith@foo.org>
  • If the patch has been submitted to LKML, but not accepted into any maintainer tree
    • tag the patch subject with FROMLIST:
    • add a Link: tag with a link to the submittal on lore.kernel.org
    • add a Bug: tag with the Android bug (required for patches not accepted into a maintainer tree)
    • if changes were required, use BACKPORT: FROMLIST:
    • Example:
        FROMLIST: important patch from upstream

        This is the detailed description of the important patch

        Signed-off-by: Fred Jones <fred.jones@foo.org>

        Bug: 135791357
        Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190619171517.GA17557@someone.com/
        Change-Id: I4caaaa566ea080fa148c5e768bb1a0b6f7201c01
        Signed-off-by: Joe Smith <joe.smith@foo.org>
  • If a patch has been submitted to the community, but rejected, do NOT use the FROMLIST: tag to try to hide this fact. Use the ANDROID: tag as described below as this must be considered as an Android-specific submission, not an upstream submission as the community will not accept these changes as-is.

Requirements for Android-specific patches: ANDROID:

  • If the patch is fixing a bug to Android-specific code
    • tag the patch subject with ANDROID:
    • add a Fixes: tag that cites the patch with the bug
    • Example:
        ANDROID: fix android-specific bug in foobar.c

        This is the detailed description of the important fix

        Fixes: 1234abcd2468 ("foobar: add cool feature")
        Change-Id: I4caaaa566ea080fa148c5e768bb1a0b6f7201c01
        Signed-off-by: Joe Smith <joe.smith@foo.org>
  • If the patch is a new feature
    • tag the patch subject with ANDROID:
    • add a Bug: tag with the Android bug (required for android-specific features)