loop: fix concurrent lo_open/lo_release
commit ae6650163c66a7eff1acd6eb8b0f752dcfa8eba5 upstream.
范龙飞 reports that KASAN can report a use-after-free in __lock_acquire.
The reason is due to insufficient serialization in lo_release(), which
will continue to use the loop device even after it has decremented the
lo_refcnt to zero.
In the meantime, another process can come in, open the loop device
again as it is being shut down. Confusion ensues.
Reported-by: 范龙飞 <long7573@126.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: Ben Hutchings <ben.hutchings@codethink.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
diff --git a/drivers/block/loop.c b/drivers/block/loop.c
index 24d6cef..402254d 100644
--- a/drivers/block/loop.c
+++ b/drivers/block/loop.c
@@ -1558,9 +1558,8 @@
return err;
}
-static void lo_release(struct gendisk *disk, fmode_t mode)
+static void __lo_release(struct loop_device *lo)
{
- struct loop_device *lo = disk->private_data;
int err;
if (atomic_dec_return(&lo->lo_refcnt))
@@ -1586,6 +1585,13 @@
mutex_unlock(&lo->lo_ctl_mutex);
}
+static void lo_release(struct gendisk *disk, fmode_t mode)
+{
+ mutex_lock(&loop_index_mutex);
+ __lo_release(disk->private_data);
+ mutex_unlock(&loop_index_mutex);
+}
+
static const struct block_device_operations lo_fops = {
.owner = THIS_MODULE,
.open = lo_open,
