BACKPORT: f2fs: compress: fix inconsistent update of i_blocks in release_compress_blocks and reserve_compress_blocks

After release a file and subsequently reserve it, the FSCK flag is set
when the file is deleted, as shown in the following backtrace:

F2FS-fs (dm-48): Inconsistent i_blocks, ino:401231, iblocks:1448, sectors:1472
fs_rec_info_write_type+0x58/0x274
f2fs_rec_info_write+0x1c/0x2c
set_sbi_flag+0x74/0x98
dec_valid_block_count+0x150/0x190
f2fs_truncate_data_blocks_range+0x2d4/0x3cc
f2fs_do_truncate_blocks+0x2fc/0x5f0
f2fs_truncate_blocks+0x68/0x100
f2fs_truncate+0x80/0x128
f2fs_evict_inode+0x1a4/0x794
evict+0xd4/0x280
iput+0x238/0x284
do_unlinkat+0x1ac/0x298
__arm64_sys_unlinkat+0x48/0x68
invoke_syscall+0x58/0x11c

For clusters of the following type, i_blocks are decremented by 1 and
i_compr_blocks are incremented by 7 in release_compress_blocks, while
updates to i_blocks and i_compr_blocks are skipped in reserve_compress_blocks.

raw node:
D D D D D D D D
after compress:
C D D D D D D D
after reserve:
C D D D D D D D

Let's update i_blocks and i_compr_blocks properly in reserve_compress_blocks.

Bug: 403145794
Fixes: eb8fbaa53374 ("f2fs: compress: fix to check unreleased compressed cluster")
Change-Id: I596af62bbd54941bfc77f30e182db94e81cba59b
Signed-off-by: Qi Han <hanqi@vivo.com>
Reviewed-by: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
(cherry picked from commit 26413ce18e85de3dda2cd3d72c3c3e8ab8f4f996)
(cherry picked from commit 90d495244f3b9d0f69f7a158d2fcbc0d91d2592e)
1 file changed
tree: 7c5b9f2323927beb8004fdc1afeb92faf68b2066
  1. android/
  2. arch/
  3. block/
  4. certs/
  5. crypto/
  6. Documentation/
  7. drivers/
  8. fs/
  9. include/
  10. init/
  11. io_uring/
  12. ipc/
  13. kernel/
  14. lib/
  15. LICENSES/
  16. mm/
  17. net/
  18. samples/
  19. scripts/
  20. security/
  21. sound/
  22. tools/
  23. usr/
  24. virt/
  25. .clang-format
  26. .cocciconfig
  27. .get_maintainer.ignore
  28. .gitattributes
  29. .gitignore
  30. .mailmap
  31. build.config.aarch64
  32. build.config.allmodconfig
  33. build.config.allmodconfig.aarch64
  34. build.config.allmodconfig.arm
  35. build.config.allmodconfig.x86_64
  36. build.config.amlogic
  37. build.config.arm
  38. build.config.common
  39. build.config.db845c
  40. build.config.gki
  41. build.config.gki-debug.aarch64
  42. build.config.gki-debug.x86_64
  43. build.config.gki.aarch64
  44. build.config.gki.aarch64.fips140
  45. build.config.gki.aarch64.fips140_eval_testing
  46. build.config.gki.x86_64
  47. build.config.gki_kasan
  48. build.config.gki_kasan.aarch64
  49. build.config.gki_kasan.x86_64
  50. build.config.gki_kprobes
  51. build.config.gki_kprobes.aarch64
  52. build.config.gki_kprobes.x86_64
  53. build.config.hikey960
  54. build.config.khwasan
  55. build.config.rockchip
  56. build.config.x86_64
  57. COPYING
  58. CREDITS
  59. Kbuild
  60. Kconfig
  61. MAINTAINERS
  62. Makefile
  63. OWNERS
  64. README
  65. README.md
README.md

How do I submit patches to Android Common Kernels

  1. BEST: Make all of your changes to upstream Linux. If appropriate, backport to the stable releases. These patches will be merged automatically in the corresponding common kernels. If the patch is already in upstream Linux, post a backport of the patch that conforms to the patch requirements below.

    • Do not send patches upstream that contain only symbol exports. To be considered for upstream Linux, additions of EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL() require an in-tree modular driver that uses the symbol -- so include the new driver or changes to an existing driver in the same patchset as the export.
    • When sending patches upstream, the commit message must contain a clear case for why the patch is needed and beneficial to the community. Enabling out-of-tree drivers or functionality is not not a persuasive case.
  2. LESS GOOD: Develop your patches out-of-tree (from an upstream Linux point-of-view). Unless these are fixing an Android-specific bug, these are very unlikely to be accepted unless they have been coordinated with kernel-team@android.com. If you want to proceed, post a patch that conforms to the patch requirements below.

Common Kernel patch requirements

  • All patches must conform to the Linux kernel coding standards and pass script/checkpatch.pl
  • Patches shall not break gki_defconfig or allmodconfig builds for arm, arm64, x86, x86_64 architectures (see https://source.android.com/setup/build/building-kernels)
  • If the patch is not merged from an upstream branch, the subject must be tagged with the type of patch: UPSTREAM:, BACKPORT:, FROMGIT:, FROMLIST:, or ANDROID:.
  • All patches must have a Change-Id: tag (see https://gerrit-review.googlesource.com/Documentation/user-changeid.html)
  • If an Android bug has been assigned, there must be a Bug: tag.
  • All patches must have a Signed-off-by: tag by the author and the submitter

Additional requirements are listed below based on patch type

Requirements for backports from mainline Linux: UPSTREAM:, BACKPORT:

  • If the patch is a cherry-pick from Linux mainline with no changes at all
    • tag the patch subject with UPSTREAM:.
    • add upstream commit information with a (cherry picked from commit ...) line
    • Example:
      • if the upstream commit message is
        important patch from upstream

        This is the detailed description of the important patch

        Signed-off-by: Fred Jones <fred.jones@foo.org>
  • then Joe Smith would upload the patch for the common kernel as
        UPSTREAM: important patch from upstream

        This is the detailed description of the important patch

        Signed-off-by: Fred Jones <fred.jones@foo.org>

        Bug: 135791357
        Change-Id: I4caaaa566ea080fa148c5e768bb1a0b6f7201c01
        (cherry picked from commit c31e73121f4c1ec41143423ac6ce3ce6dafdcec1)
        Signed-off-by: Joe Smith <joe.smith@foo.org>
  • If the patch requires any changes from the upstream version, tag the patch with BACKPORT: instead of UPSTREAM:.
    • use the same tags as UPSTREAM:
    • add comments about the changes under the (cherry picked from commit ...) line
    • Example:
        BACKPORT: important patch from upstream

        This is the detailed description of the important patch

        Signed-off-by: Fred Jones <fred.jones@foo.org>

        Bug: 135791357
        Change-Id: I4caaaa566ea080fa148c5e768bb1a0b6f7201c01
        (cherry picked from commit c31e73121f4c1ec41143423ac6ce3ce6dafdcec1)
        [joe: Resolved minor conflict in drivers/foo/bar.c ]
        Signed-off-by: Joe Smith <joe.smith@foo.org>

Requirements for other backports: FROMGIT:, FROMLIST:,

  • If the patch has been merged into an upstream maintainer tree, but has not yet been merged into Linux mainline
    • tag the patch subject with FROMGIT:
    • add info on where the patch came from as (cherry picked from commit <sha1> <repo> <branch>). This must be a stable maintainer branch (not rebased, so don't use linux-next for example).
    • if changes were required, use BACKPORT: FROMGIT:
    • Example:
      • if the commit message in the maintainer tree is
        important patch from upstream

        This is the detailed description of the important patch

        Signed-off-by: Fred Jones <fred.jones@foo.org>
  • then Joe Smith would upload the patch for the common kernel as
        FROMGIT: important patch from upstream

        This is the detailed description of the important patch

        Signed-off-by: Fred Jones <fred.jones@foo.org>

        Bug: 135791357
        (cherry picked from commit 878a2fd9de10b03d11d2f622250285c7e63deace
         https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/foo/bar.git test-branch)
        Change-Id: I4caaaa566ea080fa148c5e768bb1a0b6f7201c01
        Signed-off-by: Joe Smith <joe.smith@foo.org>
  • If the patch has been submitted to LKML, but not accepted into any maintainer tree
    • tag the patch subject with FROMLIST:
    • add a Link: tag with a link to the submittal on lore.kernel.org
    • add a Bug: tag with the Android bug (required for patches not accepted into a maintainer tree)
    • if changes were required, use BACKPORT: FROMLIST:
    • Example:
        FROMLIST: important patch from upstream

        This is the detailed description of the important patch

        Signed-off-by: Fred Jones <fred.jones@foo.org>

        Bug: 135791357
        Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190619171517.GA17557@someone.com/
        Change-Id: I4caaaa566ea080fa148c5e768bb1a0b6f7201c01
        Signed-off-by: Joe Smith <joe.smith@foo.org>

Requirements for Android-specific patches: ANDROID:

  • If the patch is fixing a bug to Android-specific code
    • tag the patch subject with ANDROID:
    • add a Fixes: tag that cites the patch with the bug
    • Example:
        ANDROID: fix android-specific bug in foobar.c

        This is the detailed description of the important fix

        Fixes: 1234abcd2468 ("foobar: add cool feature")
        Change-Id: I4caaaa566ea080fa148c5e768bb1a0b6f7201c01
        Signed-off-by: Joe Smith <joe.smith@foo.org>
  • If the patch is a new feature
    • tag the patch subject with ANDROID:
    • add a Bug: tag with the Android bug (required for android-specific features)