Google Git
Sign in
android/kernel/common.git/refs/heads/android15-6.6
commit
c0f2ff4b4f25868e6099b6b4edb921c264d596be
[log] [tgz]
author
Kalesh Singh <kaleshsingh@google.com>
Fri Mar 06 16:44:40 2026 -0800
committer
Treehugger Robot <android-test-infra-autosubmit@system.gserviceaccount.com>
Tue Mar 10 05:49:09 2026 -0700
tree
90714b977590c47aad814150638140512b5dfad6
parent
a5d39a82956df4776a1811f2dfca3dbd96e1ea27 [diff]
ANDROID: 16K: Fix double entry in [s]maps for all-pad VMAs

When a VMA containing padding is split exactly where the
padding begins. It creates 2 new VMAs; the first completely
without any padding and the subsequent VMA is all padding.

/proc/<pid>/[s]maps recursively outputs 2 entries for VMAs
with padding: one entry for the portion of the VMA that is
not padding and the next entry for the portion that is.

When a VMA is all padding as in the scenario mentioned above;
the first entry ouputted will have a length of 0

e.g:

7a4774d000-7a47750000 r-xp 00134000 00:8a 340736    /apex/com.android.runtime/lib64/bionic/libc.so
...
==> len is zero
7a47750000-7a47750000 r-xp 000ea000 00:8a 340736    /apex/com.android.runtime/lib64/bionic/libc.so
...
VmFlags: rd ex mr mw me pad=8kB
7a47750000-7a47752000 ---p 00000000 00:00 0         [page size compat]

Instead of checking the VMA nr pages when determining if
these entries shoudl be shown, instead we should be checking
the VMA data page (number of pages - padding).

Bug: 489214340
Change-Id: Icfa300be19b6e1345a630847b7e8cb4ebefa5952
Signed-off-by: Kalesh Singh <kaleshsingh@google.com>
1 file changed
tree: 90714b977590c47aad814150638140512b5dfad6
  1. android/
  2. arch/
  3. block/
  4. certs/
  5. crypto/
  6. Documentation/
  7. drivers/
  8. fs/
  9. include/
  10. init/
  11. io_uring/
  12. ipc/
  13. kernel/
  14. lib/
  15. LICENSES/
  16. mm/
  17. net/
  18. rust/
  19. samples/
  20. scripts/
  21. security/
  22. sound/
  23. tools/
  24. usr/
  25. virt/
  26. .clang-format
  27. .cocciconfig
  28. .get_maintainer.ignore
  29. .gitattributes
  30. .gitignore
  31. .mailmap
  32. .rustfmt.toml
  33. abi.bzl
  34. BUILD.bazel
  35. build.config.aarch64
  36. build.config.allmodconfig
  37. build.config.allmodconfig.aarch64
  38. build.config.allmodconfig.arm
  39. build.config.allmodconfig.x86_64
  40. build.config.amlogic
  41. build.config.arm
  42. build.config.common
  43. build.config.constants
  44. build.config.crashdump
  45. build.config.crashdump.aarch64
  46. build.config.crashdump.x86_64
  47. build.config.db845c
  48. build.config.gki
  49. build.config.gki.aarch64
  50. build.config.gki.aarch64.fips140
  51. build.config.gki.x86_64
  52. build.config.gki_kasan
  53. build.config.gki_kasan.aarch64
  54. build.config.gki_kasan.x86_64
  55. build.config.gki_kprobes
  56. build.config.gki_kprobes.aarch64
  57. build.config.gki_kprobes.x86_64
  58. build.config.khwasan
  59. build.config.kunit.aarch64
  60. build.config.kunit.x86_64
  61. build.config.microdroid
  62. build.config.microdroid.aarch64
  63. build.config.microdroid.x86_64
  64. build.config.rockpi4
  65. build.config.x86_64
  66. COPYING
  67. CREDITS
  68. Kbuild
  69. Kconfig
  70. Kconfig.ext
  71. MAINTAINERS
  72. Makefile
  73. modules.bzl
  74. OWNERS
  75. README
  76. README.md
README.md

How do I submit patches to Android Common Kernels

  1. BEST: Make all of your changes to upstream Linux. If appropriate, backport to the stable releases. These patches will be merged automatically in the corresponding common kernels. If the patch is already in upstream Linux, post a backport of the patch that conforms to the patch requirements below.

    • Do not send patches upstream that contain only symbol exports. To be considered for upstream Linux, additions of EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL() require an in-tree modular driver that uses the symbol -- so include the new driver or changes to an existing driver in the same patchset as the export.
    • When sending patches upstream, the commit message must contain a clear case for why the patch is needed and beneficial to the community. Enabling out-of-tree drivers or functionality is not a persuasive case.

  2. LESS GOOD: Develop your patches out-of-tree (from an upstream Linux point-of-view). Unless these are fixing an Android-specific bug, these are very unlikely to be accepted unless they have been coordinated with kernel-team@android.com. If you want to proceed, post a patch that conforms to the patch requirements below.

Common Kernel patch requirements

  • All patches must conform to the Linux kernel coding standards and pass scripts/checkpatch.pl
  • Patches shall not break gki_defconfig or allmodconfig builds for arm, arm64, x86, x86_64 architectures (see https://source.android.com/setup/build/building-kernels)
  • If the patch is not merged from an upstream branch, the subject must be tagged with the type of patch: UPSTREAM:, BACKPORT:, FROMGIT:, FROMLIST:, or ANDROID:.
  • All patches must have a Change-Id: tag (see https://gerrit-review.googlesource.com/Documentation/user-changeid.html)
  • If an Android bug has been assigned, there must be a Bug: tag.
  • All patches must have a Signed-off-by: tag by the author and the submitter

Additional requirements are listed below based on patch type

Requirements for backports from mainline Linux: UPSTREAM:, BACKPORT:

  • If the patch is a cherry-pick from Linux mainline with no changes at all
    • tag the patch subject with UPSTREAM:.
    • add upstream commit information with a (cherry picked from commit ...) line
    • Example:
      • if the upstream commit message is
        important patch from upstream

        This is the detailed description of the important patch

        Signed-off-by: Fred Jones <fred.jones@foo.org>
  • then Joe Smith would upload the patch for the common kernel as
        UPSTREAM: important patch from upstream

        This is the detailed description of the important patch

        Signed-off-by: Fred Jones <fred.jones@foo.org>

        Bug: 135791357
        Change-Id: I4caaaa566ea080fa148c5e768bb1a0b6f7201c01
        (cherry picked from commit c31e73121f4c1ec41143423ac6ce3ce6dafdcec1)
        Signed-off-by: Joe Smith <joe.smith@foo.org>
  • If the patch requires any changes from the upstream version, tag the patch with BACKPORT: instead of UPSTREAM:.
    • use the same tags as UPSTREAM:
    • add comments about the changes under the (cherry picked from commit ...) line
    • Example:
        BACKPORT: important patch from upstream

        This is the detailed description of the important patch

        Signed-off-by: Fred Jones <fred.jones@foo.org>

        Bug: 135791357
        Change-Id: I4caaaa566ea080fa148c5e768bb1a0b6f7201c01
        (cherry picked from commit c31e73121f4c1ec41143423ac6ce3ce6dafdcec1)
        [joe: Resolved minor conflict in drivers/foo/bar.c ]
        Signed-off-by: Joe Smith <joe.smith@foo.org>

Requirements for other backports: FROMGIT:, FROMLIST:,

  • If the patch has been merged into an upstream maintainer tree, but has not yet been merged into Linux mainline
    • tag the patch subject with FROMGIT:
    • add info on where the patch came from as (cherry picked from commit <sha1> <repo> <branch>). This must be a stable maintainer branch (not rebased, so don't use linux-next for example).
    • if changes were required, use BACKPORT: FROMGIT:
    • Example:
      • if the commit message in the maintainer tree is
        important patch from upstream

        This is the detailed description of the important patch

        Signed-off-by: Fred Jones <fred.jones@foo.org>
  • then Joe Smith would upload the patch for the common kernel as
        FROMGIT: important patch from upstream

        This is the detailed description of the important patch

        Signed-off-by: Fred Jones <fred.jones@foo.org>

        Bug: 135791357
        (cherry picked from commit 878a2fd9de10b03d11d2f622250285c7e63deace
         https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/foo/bar.git test-branch)
        Change-Id: I4caaaa566ea080fa148c5e768bb1a0b6f7201c01
        Signed-off-by: Joe Smith <joe.smith@foo.org>
  • If the patch has been submitted to LKML, but not accepted into any maintainer tree
    • tag the patch subject with FROMLIST:
    • add a Link: tag with a link to the submittal on lore.kernel.org
    • add a Bug: tag with the Android bug (required for patches not accepted into a maintainer tree)
    • if changes were required, use BACKPORT: FROMLIST:
    • Example:
        FROMLIST: important patch from upstream

        This is the detailed description of the important patch

        Signed-off-by: Fred Jones <fred.jones@foo.org>

        Bug: 135791357
        Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190619171517.GA17557@someone.com/
        Change-Id: I4caaaa566ea080fa148c5e768bb1a0b6f7201c01
        Signed-off-by: Joe Smith <joe.smith@foo.org>
  • If a patch has been submitted to the community, but rejected, do NOT use the FROMLIST: tag to try to hide this fact. Use the ANDROID: tag as described below as this must be considered as an Android-specific submission, not an upstream submission as the community will not accept these changes as-is.

Requirements for Android-specific patches: ANDROID:

  • If the patch is fixing a bug to Android-specific code
    • tag the patch subject with ANDROID:
    • add a Fixes: tag that cites the patch with the bug
    • Example:
        ANDROID: fix android-specific bug in foobar.c

        This is the detailed description of the important fix

        Fixes: 1234abcd2468 ("foobar: add cool feature")
        Change-Id: I4caaaa566ea080fa148c5e768bb1a0b6f7201c01
        Signed-off-by: Joe Smith <joe.smith@foo.org>
  • If the patch is a new feature
    • tag the patch subject with ANDROID:
    • add a Bug: tag with the Android bug (required for android-specific features)